> On Jun 21, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> On 21/06/2016 9:43 a.m., --Ahmad-- wrote:
>> Hi ,
>> i have squid that is working on 3.5 .
>> traffic of t 80 and 443 traffic to Squid via IPTables.
>>
>> Squid then passes traffic to ClamAV via C-ICAP. Squid is configured to
>> intercep
Dear Amos & eliezer
all i need right now is just having it work , since I’m not interested in
caching and i can accept the low security affect .
can i keep on squid 3.5 and do the idea of eliezer that is “"bypassing squid
SSL unwrapping.”” ??
thank you
> On Jun 21, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Amo
rom: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of --Ahmad--
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 12:43 AM
To: Squid Users
Subject: [squid-users] Squid Peek/Splice some issues
Hi ,
i have squid that is working on 3.5 .
traffic of t 80 and 443 traffic to Squid via IPTa
On 21/06/2016 9:43 a.m., --Ahmad-- wrote:
> Hi ,
> i have squid that is working on 3.5 .
> traffic of t 80 and 443 traffic to Squid via IPTables.
>
> Squid then passes traffic to ClamAV via C-ICAP. Squid is configured to
> intercept all SSL traffic and PKI has been setup and distributed to all
>
Hi ,
i have squid that is working on 3.5 .
traffic of t 80 and 443 traffic to Squid via IPTables.
Squid then passes traffic to ClamAV via C-ICAP. Squid is configured to
intercept all SSL traffic and PKI has been setup and distributed to all clients.
we have a problem in Skype of Business (Offic
