tks amos yes its just to have some gain of caching
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Spdy-header-and-related-tp4678728p4678731.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On 4/08/2016 12:34 a.m., joe wrote:
> is it ok to drop X-Firefox-Spdy
> reply_header_access X-Firefox-Spdy deny all
> just alow http/1
"just allow http/1" is not what the above does. It simply denies the
client being informed about that header existing.
> and if yes how chrome use Spdy in header
is it ok to drop X-Firefox-Spdy
reply_header_access X-Firefox-Spdy deny all
just alow http/1
and if yes how chrome use Spdy in header to drop it
dose it heart the clients app or browsig ??
im droping those as well so fare so good no complain
reply_header_access Strict-Transport-Security deny all
