By now i not see anymore the single squid process taking all the resources,
using the multi process the load is spread and all seem work really well. I
see only sometimes the clam-d service hitting 100% for few istants but i
think that is normal, as it's a single process, but not cause any slowdown
On 27/04/18 03:19, masterx81 wrote:
> For now i've tried with the "workers 3" directive, i can see 3 squid process,
> seem that they span quite evenly the load and the page loading seem better.
> Hope that fix the bottlenek...
> In any case, i not know if there is somtheing wrong in the config that
For now i've tried with the "workers 3" directive, i can see 3 squid process,
seem that they span quite evenly the load and the page loading seem better.
Hope that fix the bottlenek...
In any case, i not know if there is somtheing wrong in the config that can
hurt the performance
--
Sent fro
Wow, a lot to read (and understand, for a newbie like me :-|)
From what i've seen it's sufficient to insert the "workers n" directive in
the conf (n number of workers). With some limitations with the features that
support SMP (delay pools, cache, etc - i not think to use any of them)
--
Sent
On 04/24/2018 06:14 AM, masterx81 wrote:
> I've configured squid with ssl_bump and now the squid process (not the
> helpers) takes quite load. There aren't too much clients on it (max 50).
> I've already increased the number of vcpu for the machine, but the only
> process that i see eating cpu is
Hi!
I've configured squid with ssl_bump and now the squid process (not the
helpers) takes quite load. There aren't too much clients on it (max 50).
This is the config (ripped some acl to make it readable):
--
cache_mgr x...@xxx.com
visible_hostn
