On 20/03/2015 7:17 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 20/03/2015 2:55 p.m., Lawrence Pingree wrote:
>> No matter what cache_mem I set it seems that MRTG queries via SNMP never
>> seem to get beyond 1 GB even running the latest 3.5 code. Amos, is the code
>> capable of allocating more than one gig of m
On 20/03/2015 2:55 p.m., Lawrence Pingree wrote:
> No matter what cache_mem I set it seems that MRTG queries via SNMP never
> seem to get beyond 1 GB even running the latest 3.5 code. Amos, is the code
> capable of allocating more than one gig of memory?
Yes but the SNMPv2 used by Squid only has 3
No matter what cache_mem I set it seems that MRTG queries via SNMP never
seem to get beyond 1 GB even running the latest 3.5 code. Amos, is the code
capable of allocating more than one gig of memory?
Storage Mem Size @ x
The statistics were last updated Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 18:48,
at
