Re: [squid-users] Rock store status

2016-09-14 Thread FredB
Hello Alex and thank you for the explanations, I forgot but of course the test is running on same hardware and same full caches (2 sata drives 15k rpm 123 Gb of caches each) I will return to diskd now, because the point 2 is annoying for me, but rock seems very promising for me

Re: [squid-users] Rock store status

2016-09-13 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 09/13/2016 05:01 AM, FredB wrote: > One thing, squid restart is very slow because of time required to rebuild the > cache > > 2016/09/13 00:25:34| Took 1498.42 seconds (3972.24 objects/sec). -> Rock > 2016/09/13 00:00:51| Took 5.71 seconds (533481.90 objects/sec). -> Diskd This is a known

Re: [squid-users] Rock store status

2016-09-13 Thread FredB
One thing, squid restart is very slow because of time required to rebuild the cache 2016/09/13 00:25:34| Took 1498.42 seconds (3972.24 objects/sec). -> Rock 2016/09/13 00:00:51| Took 5.71 seconds (533481.90 objects/sec). -> Diskd ___ squid-users ma

Re: [squid-users] Rock store status

2016-09-12 Thread FredB
Just for for information, no problem after two weeks. Unfortunately I can't test now with IpcIo (a problem with systemd) but rock store is very stable ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/

Re: [squid-users] Rock store status

2016-08-19 Thread Steve Hill
On 19/08/16 08:45, FredB wrote: Please can you describe your load and configurations ? We supply Squid based online safety systems to schools across the UK, utilising Rock store for caching and peek/splice, external ACLs and ICAP for access control/filtering/auditing. Typically I think our

Re: [squid-users] Rock store status

2016-08-19 Thread FredB
> > We use SMP and Rock under the 3.5 series without problems. But I > don't > think any of our sites have as high req/sec load as you. Thanks for your answer Please can you describe your load and configurations ? No crash ? Fred ___ squid-users mai

Re: [squid-users] Rock store status

2016-08-18 Thread Steve Hill
On 17/08/16 11:50, FredB wrote: I tried rock store and smp long time ago (squid 3.2 I guess), Unfortunately I definitely drop smp because there are some limitations (In my case), and I fall-back to diskd because there were many bugs with rock store. FI I also switched to aufs without big diff

[squid-users] Rock store status

2016-08-17 Thread FredB
Hello All, I tried rock store and smp long time ago (squid 3.2 I guess), Unfortunately I definitely drop smp because there are some limitations (In my case), and I fall-back to diskd because there were many bugs with rock store. FI I also switched to aufs without big differences. But now with