: Removal of ESI Support from Squid
I use bump splice, with split acls and access lists that match MAC addresses,
plus cachemgr, I hate to admit I am using 5.8 because 6.6 has issues with so
many errors showing and is so much slower. I do not want to reissue all my
certificates, it works perfect for
On 9/8/24 18:49, Francesco Chemolli wrote:
Hi,
ESI websites are not public; they are meant to be used in a reverse
proxy environment. The ESI directives are interpreted by the reverse
proxy and replaced with other content
Thanks a lot.
So I guess the answer if "NO: I don't need ESI in Squi
Hi,
ESI websites are not public; they are meant to be used in a reverse proxy
environment. The ESI directives are interpreted by the reverse proxy and
replaced with other content
Francesco
On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 at 6:32 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 9/7/24 17:43, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > Hi a
On 9/7/24 17:43, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Hi all,
Hello.
DO you need ESI in Squid? Yes or No.
Speak Now, or face regrets at upgrade time.
I'd gladly answer, but my ignorance forbids me.
Supposing I don't use ESI myself, would that me "No".
Or can my users access (via Squid) a p
I use bump splice, with split acls and access lists that match MAC addresses,
plus cachemgr, I hate to admit I am using 5.8 because 6.6 has issues with so
many errors showing and is so much slower. I do not want to reissue all my
certificates, it works perfect for what I need in my mini firewall
Hi all,
The ESI (Edge Side Includes) feature of Squid has a growing number of
unfixed bugs, more than a few are turning into security issues.
Also, the current Squid developers do not have spare brain cycles to
maintain everything and v7 is seeing a lot more effort to prune away old
and unus
