-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/2014 10:18 a.m., Linda W wrote:
> Stephen Baynes wrote:
>> On a multi CPU box - the number of Squid workers has a very big
>> effect of the throughput.
> --- Last I heard that option was only available for requests 32KB
> or smaller. Has it i
Stephen Baynes wrote:
On a multi CPU box - the number of Squid workers has a very big effect
of the throughput.
---
Last I heard that option was only available for requests
32KB or smaller. Has it increased?
Dunno about your use case, but looking
at my cache right now, I see 505049 files using
On 10/15/2014 3:41 AM, Jacques Kruger wrote:
Hi,
I’ve implemented my fair share of squid proxies over the past couple
of years and I’ve always been able to find a solution in the mail
archive, but this time around I’m stumped. This is the first time I’ve
used squid with a fast (in our contex
Thanks - at least I can now start to plan for the future.
Regards,
Jacques
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Sent: 15 October 2014 01:48 PM
To: Jacques Kruger; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Question on throughput
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/10/2014 12:36 a.m., Jacques Kruger wrote:
> Thanks for the information.
>
> I'll do some further testing and confirm that the CPU isn't the
> bottleneck in this case. The machine is a bit long in the tooth but
> with the faster connection this c
] On Behalf
Of Stephen Baynes
Sent: 15 October 2014 11:23 AM
To: squid-us...@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Question on throughput
On a multi CPU box - the number of Squid workers has a very big effect of the
throughput.
Stephen
On 15 October 2014 09:41, Jacques Kruger wrote:
>
ance or is the
current focus on squid3?
Regards,
Jacques
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Amos Jeffries
Sent: 15 October 2014 11:31 AM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Question on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/10/2014 9:41 p.m., Jacques Kruger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've implemented my fair share of squid proxies over the past
> couple of years and I've always been able to find a solution in the
> mail archive, but this time around I'm stumped. This is the
On a multi CPU box - the number of Squid workers has a very big effect
of the throughput.
Stephen
On 15 October 2014 09:41, Jacques Kruger wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’ve implemented my fair share of squid proxies over the past couple of
> years and I’ve always been able to find a solution in the mail
Hi,
I've implemented my fair share of squid proxies over the past couple of years
and I've always been able to find a solution in the mail archive, but this time
around I'm stumped. This is the first time I've used squid with a fast (in our
context) internet connection, specifically a 4G connec
10 matches
Mail list logo
