Hello Amos,
>If you have a mix of "/cache${process_number}" and "/cache1" in your
>config files you may still be mixing SMP-aware and SMP-disabled access
>to the "/cache1" path.
That's exactly what happened to us, as I mentioned, we are new in the
Squid's world. I have several years of experienc
On 24/11/18 3:21 am, pacolo wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> We have found an issue in backend.conf, as the Rock cache_dir is SMP aware.
>
> Change this...
> #cache_dir rock /cache${process_number} 2097152
> to this...
> cache_dir rock /cache1 2097152
>
>
> ... then the new errors are:
> Nov 23 14:55:
Hello again,
We have found an issue in backend.conf, as the Rock cache_dir is SMP aware.
Change this...
#cache_dir rock /cache${process_number} 2097152
to this...
cache_dir rock /cache1 2097152
... then the new errors are:
Nov 23 14:55:28 px06 squid[12559]: ERROR: /cache1/rock communication cha
Hello people,
@Alex, thanks for your help, we took your advise and change the deployment
to SMP, some issues were solved, but others appeared :-(.
The config files are attached, in case anybody could help or to help others
with our same issues, as we have been searching several days and we didn't
On 11/8/18 8:46 AM, pacolo wrote:
> assertion failed: filemap.cc:50: "capacity_ <= (1 << 24)"
> I have noticed that this problem could be related to the maximum value of
> our cache_dir size, according to...
> https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3566
As that bug discussion attempt
Hello,
I am having performance issues with a deployment of a farm of 5 servers
(CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804) with Squid 3.5.20-12.el7, that are used for
the internet access of a scholar community.
This is around 7 Gbps at peak hour, including 60% of HTTPS not processed at
the moment by Squid (we
On 01/15/2018 11:56 AM, Snyder, Brian wrote:
> I have not found an issue the hardware.
To avoid misunderstanding, I did not imply that there are
hardware-related issues. My question was about bottlenecks (i.e.,
resources that are being overused, including hardware resources like CPU
or RAM and so
Thank you for your reply. I have not found an issue the hardware. Atop shows
everything in normal ranges. I do know the squid is about 50% faster with our
filter set up as a parent vs routing through it normally. Not sure why that
would be. However, when I set it up as a parent I notice quite a
On 01/11/2018 10:14 AM, Snyder, Brian wrote:
> I apologise for asking another squid performance question,
There is nothing wrong with that! It is often very difficult to solve
performance problems on the mailing list, but that does not imply folks
should not ask performance questions.
> over t
Hello All,
I apologise for asking another squid performance question, but I have been
banging my head against the wall for the better part of three months. Squid is
installed and working. However, over time it slows down significantly. I have
tried everything from turning off caching to trying
10 matches
Mail list logo
