mail: elie...@ngtech.co.il
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Alex Rousskov
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 8:45 AM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] NOTICE: Authentication not applicable on intercepted
On 06/30/2016 01:19 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> On 30.06.2016 17:04, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Use a myportname ACL to prevent Squid attempting impossible things like
>> authentication on intercepted traffic.
> Sorry, but I still didn't get the idea. I have one port that squid is
> configured t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
01.07.2016 1:19, Eugene M. Zheganin пишет:
Interceprion proxy don't support auth. By default. End of discussion.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXdXErAAoJENNXIZxhPexGHuwIAIlMz0C0PIyIQ1iL3eS71M0d
85SHy+iET55da6R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
01.07.2016 1:19, Eugene M. Zheganin пишет:
> Hi.
>
> On 30.06.2016 17:04, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 30/06/2016 9:21 p.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could this message be moved on loglevel 2 instead of 1 ?
>>> I think that this me
Hi.
On 30.06.2016 17:04, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 30/06/2016 9:21 p.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi,
Could this message be moved on loglevel 2 instead of 1 ?
I think that this message does 95% of the logs of the intercept-enabled
caches with authentication.
At least some switch would be nice,
On 30/06/2016 9:21 p.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could this message be moved on loglevel 2 instead of 1 ?
> I think that this message does 95% of the logs of the intercept-enabled
> caches with authentication.
>
> At least some switch would be nice, to switch this off instead of
> swi
Hi,
Could this message be moved on loglevel 2 instead of 1 ?
I think that this message does 95% of the logs of the intercept-enabled
caches with authentication.
At least some switch would be nice, to switch this off instead of
switching the while facility to 0.
Thanks.
Eugene.
__
