Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-02-26 Thread FredB
Yes, here my usage case 1- Squid as explicit proxy connected to e2guardian with ICAP 2 - E2guardian block a SSL website (no bump) a 403 header is returned -> I tried 302, 307, 200, without more success 3 - With IE or chrome the connection is well dropped but with FF (61 -> next 67) the conne

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-02-25 Thread eliezer
-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains) Hello, when a SSL website request is dropped by proxy with FF the connection is not well finished Example of this here, first message: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1522093

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-02-25 Thread FredB
Hello, when a SSL website request is dropped by proxy with FF the connection is not well finished Example of this here, first message: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1522093 ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-02-24 Thread eliezer
-users@lists.squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains) Thanks, there a lot of impacts here, response time, load average, etc, unfortunately we should wait that FF 66 (and after) is installed everywhere to fix that ... I'm really surp

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-02-24 Thread FredB
Thanks, there a lot of impacts here, response time, load average, etc, unfortunately we should wait that FF 66 (and after) is installed everywhere to fix that ... I'm really surprised that there is no more messages about this Fred ___ squid-users m

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-02-19 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 2/19/19 1:40 AM, FredB wrote: > there was a bug in Firefox with huge impact for some configurations > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1522093 Congratulations on getting that Firefox bug fixed! Alex. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-us

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-02-19 Thread FredB
Amos, Alex Ithought you might beinterested, there was a bug in Firefox with huge impact for some configurations https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1522093 Regards Fredb ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org htt

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-01-24 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 1/23/19 3:17 AM, FredB wrote: > I found nothing in documentation about client_persistent_connections off > impact, do you think this can be problematic with high load ? Yes, disabling client-to-Squid persistent connections can increase load on the proxy server. In SslBump environments that bum

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-01-23 Thread FredB
As a workaround, you can try disabling client-to-Squid persistent connections (client_persistent_connections off) or changing your ICAP service to produce a response with a non-empty 403 body. You are right this is a browser bug (firefox at least recent versions) and this issue can be resol

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-01-22 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 1/22/19 1:22 AM, FredB wrote: > Here a short tcpdump trace > https://nas.traceroot.fr:8081/owncloud/index.php/s/egrcXnU3lxiU0mi > >   1 - I'm surfing to the website https://www.toto.fr Yes (tcp.stream eq 30). >   2 - I receive a 403 (blank page) > HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden > Server: e2guardia

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-01-22 Thread FredB
Hello Alex But unfortunately Squid adds a "Connection: keep-alive" header It is not clear _why_ you consider that header "unfortunate" and the connection "wasted". That header may or may not be wrong, and the connection may or may not be reusable, depending on many factors (that you have not s

Re: [squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-01-21 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 1/21/19 3:35 AM, FredB wrote: > I'm playing with Squid4 and e2guardian as ICAP server. > > I'm seeing something I misunderstand, when a SSL website is blocked > e2guardian returns a encapsulated "HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" header this > part seems good to me with an encrypted website a denied or

[squid-users] ICAP and 403 Encapsulated answers (SSL denied domains)

2019-01-21 Thread FredB
Hello all, I'm playing with Squid4 and e2guardian as ICAP server. I'm seeing something I misunderstand, when a SSL website is blocked e2guardian returns a encapsulated "HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" header this part seems good to me with an encrypted website a denied or redirection page can't be ad