To: "Craddock, Tommy"
Cc: "squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] HTTPS support
Seems to me you are overthinking this. What you're up against is blocked
outbound ports. Simply run openvpn at your home over
nwald
To: "Craddock, Tommy"
Cc: "squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] HTTPS support
Seems to me you are overthinking this. What you're up against is blocked
outbound ports. Simply run openvpn at your home over
uter to the HAProxy box.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] *On
> Behalf Of *j m
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 03, 2017 3:14 PM
>
> *To:* squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [squid-users
: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 3:14 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] HTTPS support
Looks interesting, but it looks complex and sounds like I'd need more of a
router than I have to do it.
From: "Craddock, Tommy"
mai
Looks interesting, but it looks complex and sounds like I'd need more of a
router than I have to do it.
From: "Craddock, Tommy"
To: "squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] HTTPS support
#yiv
@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] HTTPS support
In any case, I'm finding SSH through proxy is undesirable or not possible. I'm
thinking shellinabox, which is insecure but run over a secure proxy link, is my
best bet.
From: Alex Rousskov
ma
017 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] HTTPS support
On 05/03/2017 11:37 AM, j m wrote:
> the plan was to use SSH through the proxy.
If your SSH clients support SSH through an HTTP proxy, then do not
authenticate them in Squid. Just do not let them go anywhere but the SSH
server. It would be
y FTP) proxy, not a general-purpose TCP proxy.
This is the first I've been told this. I personally don't know since I'm very
proxy-illiterate.
From: Antony Stone
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] HTTPS
TTP-proxying SSH connections.
Alex.
>
> *From:* Alex Rousskov
> *To:* "squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"
>
> *Cc:* j m
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 3, 2017 12:22 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [squid-users] H
On Wednesday 03 May 2017 at 18:37:36, j m wrote:
> I cannot SSH into my home server from an organization that is apparently
> blocking SSH connections, for whatever reason, intentional or not. I am,
> however, able to use a squid proxy that I run from my home server.
So, redirect *external* conn
Options" for the http_port directive (not the https_port directive!).
This is helpful since I was trying to use https_port.
From: Alex Rousskov
To: "squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"
Cc: j m
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] HTTPS support
On
On 05/03/2017 10:57 AM, j m wrote:
> I wanted to set up a proxy on my home server for use from remote
> locations to use as a web proxy (of course) and also to run SSH over.
The "ssh" part is unrelated to Squid. Secure ssh separately from Squid.
> This means that basic auth is undesirable due to
I wanted to set up a proxy on my home server for use from remote locations to
use as a web proxy (of course) and also to run SSH over. This means that basic
auth is undesirable due to the login being sent in clear text. So, someone
suggested digest auth, and I was happy. But, now I'm finding
13 matches
Mail list logo