Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-12-10 Thread HaxNobody
squid -v: Squid Cache: Version 3.3.10 configure options: '--build=x86_64-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--includedir=${prefix}/include' '--mandir=${prefix}/share/man' '--infodir=${prefix}/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--localstatedir=/var' '--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/bloxx-squid3' '--srcdir=.' '-

Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-12-10 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2014 09:25 PM, HaxNobody wrote: > The proxy runs on Linux (Ubuntu, I believe), and I'm doing my > testing from multiple browsers on Windows 8.1. I have been unable > to find a way to use openssl s_client via a proxy, although I was > able to r

Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-12-10 Thread HaxNobody
>What is your testing environment? >What OS? >What Browser? >Have you tried with openssl s_client? > >Eliezer The proxy runs on Linux (Ubuntu, I believe), and I'm doing my testing from multiple browsers on Windows 8.1. I have been unable to find a way to use openssl s_client via a proxy, although

Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-12-10 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2014 09:04 PM, HaxNobody wrote: > Hello, > > I found another possible cause. I have a certificate that works > properly with this proxy, and it has a signature algorithm of > SHA256. The certificates that I have that do not work properly are

Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-12-10 Thread HaxNobody
Hello, I found another possible cause. I have a certificate that works properly with this proxy, and it has a signature algorithm of SHA256. The certificates that I have that do not work properly are SHA1. Is this a possible reason it's not working the way I want it to? If so, what options do I ha

Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-11-30 Thread Amos Jeffries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27/11/2014 6:45 a.m., HaxNobody wrote: > Alright, I figured out a possible cause. I downloaded the > certificate that the browsers were complaining about, and used > openssl verify to verify against the root certificate that I have. > I got error 20

Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-11-26 Thread HaxNobody
Alright, I figured out a possible cause. I downloaded the certificate that the browsers were complaining about, and used openssl verify to verify against the root certificate that I have. I got error 20, indicating that squid must not be using the correct root certificate to generate the client cer

Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-11-26 Thread HaxNobody
Thanks for the reply. I'm aware of pinning, but this problem is happening on small and/or insignificant sites that are certainly not pinned, as well as the larger sites. In addition, our clients are not getting errors due to pinning on our existing proxy setup, so we're doing something correctly th

Re: [squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-11-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26/11/2014 5:38 a.m., HaxNobody wrote: > Hello, > > We are trying to configure Squid with SSL bump in order to filter > traffic with a content filter. We have an existing self-signed root > certificate and private key that we use successfully with

[squid-users] Existing root certificate not working with SSL Bump (squid 3.3.10)

2014-11-25 Thread HaxNobody
Hello, We are trying to configure Squid with SSL bump in order to filter traffic with a content filter. We have an existing self-signed root certificate and private key that we use successfully with other similar proxy software, and we wish to re-use it with Squid so that we don't have to distribu