On 7/07/2016 1:01 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote:
> It looks like I'm probably going to get fobbed off by this site's
> administrators. "It's our load balancer" — "Simply set up a bypass" etc.
>
Hmm. How to politely answer that..
Sending their traffic to goaste is not a polite option.
> Is there
It looks like I'm probably going to get fobbed off by this site's
administrators. "It's our load balancer" — "Simply set up a bypass" etc.
Is there any straightforward way to disable the X-Forwarded-For header just
for requests to this one website? What would be implications of that be?
Dan
On 5
That’s a super helpful analysis, thanks Amos.
Now to see if I track down the site admins 🙃
> On 5 Jul 2016, at 3:04 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> On 5/07/2016 4:25 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote:
>> This website seems not send back a proper web page if the request comes via
>> a (squid?) proxy.
>
On 5/07/2016 4:25 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote:
> This website seems not send back a proper web page if the request comes via a
> (squid?) proxy.
>
> http://passporttosafety.com.au/
>
> Can anyone tell what might be going wrong here?
>
Happens whenever it sees an X-Forwarded-For header.
It lo
This website seems not send back a proper web page if the request comes via a
(squid?) proxy.
http://passporttosafety.com.au/
Can anyone tell what might be going wrong here?
Best,
Dan
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http
