; >>>> check that out, although I think that it's a problem even for
> >>>> bumped users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so
> >>>> that really could be it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
s.squid-cache.org] On
> Behalf Of Antony Stone
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 4:31 PM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in log files
>
> On Friday 10 March 2017 at 22:22:59, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> Of course, there is no
11.03.2017 3:43, Antony Stone пишет:
> On Friday 10 March 2017 at 22:33:44, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> We have not seen the network topology and the full configuration of
>> network devices - what are we arguing about and guessing about?
> Nobody is arguing, and we are guessing so that we might be h
repancy is all
sslbump traffic.
Thank you all,
Yosi
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 4:31 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in
On Friday 10 March 2017 at 22:33:44, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> We have not seen the network topology and the full configuration of
> network devices - what are we arguing about and guessing about?
Nobody is arguing, and we are guessing so that we might be helpful to Yosi who
asked the question.
Inci
r bumped
>>>>>> users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so that really
>>>>>> could be it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Original Message
t it's a problem even for bumped
> >>>> users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so that really
> >>>> could be it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>&
ump, but not for all users. I'll
>>>>> check that out, although I think that it's a problem even for bumped
>>>>> users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so that really
>>>>> could be it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>
t;>>> proxy usage in my squid logs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Data compression would give the opposite result, so that's not what
>>>>> I'm seeing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any other ideas?
>>>> Is there any traffic that is n
gt;>> users. Even for bumped users we don't bump all sites, so that really
>>> could be it.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
> > Behalf Of Marcus Kool
> > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:38 PM
> > To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> > Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in
On 03/10/2017 01:37 PM, Marcus Kool wrote:
> Squid has no idea how many bytes go through the (HTTPS) tunnels.
Actually, Squid knows the number of raw (encrypted) TCP payload bytes
inside a tunnel and should log that.
Squid also knows and logs the number of HTTP (decrypted) bytes if the
SSL tunnel
t; Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:38 PM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in log files
>
>
>
> On 10/03/17 16:27, Yosi Greenfield wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Netflow is much larger.
>>
>> I really want t
quid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
Behalf Of Marcus Kool
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:38 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in log files
On 10/03/17 16:27, Yosi Greenfield wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Netflow is much larger.
&
uid has no idea how many bytes go through the (HTTPS) tunnels.
Marcus
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 2:21 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-us
0, 2017 2:21 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Data usage reported in log files
On Friday 10 March 2017 at 20:14:36, Yosi Greenfield wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm analyzing my squid logs with sarg, and I see that the number of
> bytes reported as
On Friday 10 March 2017 at 20:14:36, Yosi Greenfield wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm analyzing my squid logs with sarg, and I see that the number of
> bytes reported as used by any particular user are often nowhere
> near the bytes reported by netflow and tcpdump.
Which is larger?
> I'm trying to t
Hello all,
I'm analyzing my squid logs with sarg, and I see that the number of
bytes reported as used by any particular user are often nowhere
near the bytes reported by netflow and tcpdump.
I'm trying to trace my users' data usage by site, but I'm unable to
do so from the log files because of th
18 matches
Mail list logo
