Re: [squid-users] Chrome 69

2018-10-02 Thread Service MV
Excellent Amos! I have to admit that I was approaching that conclusion. I did exactly as you told me and problem solved. I will consider your recommendations when I need to add more rules. Best regards! Gabriel El lun., 1 de oct. de 2018 a la(s) 18:04, Amos Jeffries ( squ...@treenet.co.nz) escrib

Re: [squid-users] Chrome 69

2018-10-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2/10/18 9:28 AM, neok wrote: > As far as I know, nothing's changed. The only thing that could have happened > is that Chrome was updated. I'm reviewing that. > > This say Firefox when try acces to denied site: > The proxy server is refusing connections. > Firefox is configured to use a proxy se

Re: [squid-users] Chrome 69

2018-10-01 Thread neok
As far as I know, nothing's changed. The only thing that could have happened is that Chrome was updated. I'm reviewing that. This say Firefox when try acces to denied site: The proxy server is refusing connections. Firefox is configured to use a proxy server that is refusing connections. Try acc

Re: [squid-users] Chrome 69

2018-10-01 Thread Antony Stone
On Monday 01 October 2018 at 21:53:42, neok wrote: > Hello everyone! > I'm a bit lost with the behavior of Google Chrome 69.0 for Win 64 and my > squid rules 3.5.20. > Until a few days ago Any idea what changed a few days ago? > when browsing denied sites Chrome threw the error > "ERR_TUNNEL_CON

[squid-users] Chrome 69

2018-10-01 Thread neok
Hello everyone! I'm a bit lost with the behavior of Google Chrome 69.0 for Win 64 and my squid rules 3.5.20. Until a few days ago when browsing denied sites Chrome threw the error "ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED" which was fine for me. Firefox 62 threw the error "The proxy server is refusing connecti