Hi Amos,
Thanks for the explainations
Bye Fred
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Cache-peers-with-different-load-tp4671204p4671249.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On 12/05/2015 2:28 a.m., Stakres wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>
> OK, got it.
> But why a so big gap on the 2 parents ?
> The 3 squids are on the same range, connected to the same switch, all in 1Gb
> NIC.
> No problem if there are some MB difference, but here it's 10+ times more
> between 2 parents
Only
Hi Amos,
OK, got it.
But why a so big gap on the 2 parents ?
The 3 squids are on the same range, connected to the same switch, all in 1Gb
NIC.
No problem if there are some MB difference, but here it's 10+ times more
between 2 parents
Bye Fred
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web
On 12/05/2015 12:01 a.m., Stakres wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A crazy thing I cannot understand:
> - 3 squid 3.5.4
>
> the child (172.10.1.1) is like that:
> cache_peer 172.10.1.2 parent 8182 8183 proxy-only weighted-round-robin
> background-ping no-tproxy
> cache_peer 172.10.1.3 parent 8182 8183 proxy-
Hi All,
A crazy thing I cannot understand:
- 3 squid 3.5.4
the child (172.10.1.1) is like that:
cache_peer 172.10.1.2 parent 8182 8183 proxy-only weighted-round-robin
background-ping no-tproxy
cache_peer 172.10.1.3 parent 8182 8183 proxy-only weighted-round-robin
background-ping no-tproxy
ICP is
