On 27/09/17 12:55, Aaron Turner wrote:
So reading the bug comments it doesn't sound like there's any config
changes I can make (other then not use rock, which in smp doesn't
sound like a good idea). I might be able to run ALL,9 and collect
the output... would need to sanitize the URL's due to
So reading the bug comments it doesn't sound like there's any config
changes I can make (other then not use rock, which in smp doesn't
sound like a good idea). I might be able to run ALL,9 and collect
the output... would need to sanitize the URL's due to privacy/security
concerns. Anything else
On 27/09/17 10:30, Aaron Turner wrote:
Doing some basic system tests and we're seeing a bunch of errors like:
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x7f169d0a2a70 nodes.start() 0x7f169c6cc9d0
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x7f169d
if the issue is 3.5 local or
>>> if it was fixed in 4.X+ but, from my memory I think you will need to adapt
>>> your squid.conf ssl_bump configurations.
>>> You can get the latest beta and stable binaries from my repo and the beta
>>> repo details are at:
>>
u to
>> use the proxy protocol(v1) which is the best way to pass the source ip
>> addresses to the proxy.
>> I have tested squid to work with the proxy protocol v1 but yet to test v2.
>>
>> All The Bests,
>> Eliezer
>>
>>
>> Eliezer Croito
22:57
To: Eliezer Croitoru
Cc: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
So is v4 stable? I was the impression it was beta? That said, if v4
has better memory tuning options then I'm all ears. Right now I'm
fighting OOM erro
On 09/25/2017 08:19 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 26/09/17 08:56, Aaron Turner wrote:
>> I can disable rock cache, but I need some disk cache- is there a
>> better option?
> Possibly a smaller rock cache, and a UFS/AUFS/diskd cache - rock can
> share disk with another cache, its just the UFS/* cac
On 26/09/17 08:56, Aaron Turner wrote:
So is v4 stable? I was the impression it was beta? That said, if v4
has better memory tuning options then I'm all ears.
Yes it is beta. Some bugs still to work out in the ssl-bump code, but
that is all.
Overall the v4 ssl-bump code is far better behav
; All The Bests,
> Eliezer
>
>
> Eliezer Croitoru
> Linux System Administrator
> Mobile: +972-5-28704261
> Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
> Behalf Of Aa
bject: [squid-users] Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
Version: 3.5.26 on CentOS 7.3 on AWS EC2 m3.xlarge and 2x 100GB EBS
volumes for rock cache.
Doing some basic system tests and we're seeing a bunch of errors like:
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2017/09/2
I have this since forever.. 3.5.27 with one cache_peer and 4 rockstores
2017/09/21 11:19:45 kid1| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2017/09/21 11:19:45 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x1902d240 nodes.start() 0x552baa0
2017/09/21 11:19:45 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x1902d240 nodes.finish() 0x552baa0
2017/09/21 11:19:45
Version: 3.5.26 on CentOS 7.3 on AWS EC2 m3.xlarge and 2x 100GB EBS
volumes for rock cache.
Doing some basic system tests and we're seeing a bunch of errors like:
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x7f169d0a2a70 nodes.start() 0x7f16
On 10/05/2016 06:28 AM, ama...@tin.it wrote:
> I'm using squid-3.5.21-20160908-r14081 and for the first time I
> have configuration squid-smp (4workers and cache_dir rock).
> 2016/10/05 14:12:55 kid4| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
> Is it a misconfiguration ?
It is a known bug: http:/
Hello
I'm using squid-3.5.21-20160908-r14081 and for the first time I
have configuration squid-smp (4workers and cache_dir rock).
I haven't
cache_peer.
In cache.log often I found (always on different kid id):
2016/10/05 14:12:55 kid4| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2016/10/05 14:12:55
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
HTCP has the same function like ICP. So, this is predictable.
04.06.2016 3:20, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
>
> Thanks Amos,
>
> I switched to HTCP but the same problem happens..
>
> 2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
> 201
Thanks Amos,
I switched to HTCP but the same problem happens..
2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| mem_hdr: 0x72d3610 nodes.start() 0x5fc30d0
2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| mem_hdr: 0x72d3610 nodes.finish() 0x5fc30d0
2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| Mem
On 1/06/2016 4:36 a.m., Heiler Bemerguy wrote:
>
> This is the parent proxy of another one (10.1.10.101).
>
> It was receiveing requests like these:
>
> 1464665138.326 0 10.1.10.101 UDP_MISS/000 72 ICP_QUERY
> http://img.olx.com.br/thumbs/51/51763636766.jpg - HIER_NONE/- -
> 1464665138.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Aha,
for cached objects no matter HTTP or ICP query requested they.
31.05.2016 22:36, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
>
>
> This is the parent proxy of another one (10.1.10.101).
>
> It was receiveing requests like these:
>
> 1464665138.326 0 10.1.10
This is the parent proxy of another one (10.1.10.101).
It was receiveing requests like these:
1464665138.326 0 10.1.10.101 UDP_MISS/000 72 ICP_QUERY
http://img.olx.com.br/thumbs/51/51763636766.jpg - HIER_NONE/- -
1464665138.331 0 10.1.10.101 UDP_MISS/000 72 ICP_QUERY
http://img.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This proxy uses as peer for downstreams?
31.05.2016 21:09, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
>
>
> I disabled ICP requests to it and these "Bug: Missing
MemObject::storeId value" messages stopped... any thoughts?
>
> Known bug?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> He
I disabled ICP requests to it and these "Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId
value" messages stopped... any thoughts?
Known bug?
--
Best Regards,
Heiler Bemerguy
Network Manager - CINBESA
55 91 98151-4894/3184-1751
Em 31/05/2016 11:49, Yuri escreveu:
Hm. Seems related. The objects not the s
Hm. Seems related. The objects not the same in memory yet.
31.05.2016 20:45, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
Yep I know it should/would vanish all those "Vary objects" messages..
but what are these other "Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value" ?? I
thought it was related...
2016/05/31 11:43:27.594
Yep I know it should/would vanish all those "Vary objects" messages..
but what are these other "Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value" ?? I
thought it was related...
2016/05/31 11:43:27.594 kid2| clientProcessHit: URL mismatch,
'[unknown_URI]' !=
'http://www.agenciabelem.com.br/Resize/Creat
23 matches
Mail list logo
