rock ]
squid version [ Version 4.8]
thank u
From: Alex Rousskov
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 4:32 PM
To: patrick mkhael ;
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 7/7/20 6:26 AM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> **What kind of
.
thank u
From: Alex Rousskov
Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2020 3:40 AM
To: patrick mkhael ;
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 7/3/20 4:50 AM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> workers 3
> cpu_affinity_map process_numbers=1,2,3
e a way to use aufs ?
thank u
From: Alex Rousskov
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 4:24 PM
To: patrick mkhael ;
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 7/1/20 4:45 PM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> ***Please note that you have
squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 2/07/20 8:45 am, patrick mkhael wrote:
>
> ***Please note that you have 20 kids worth mapping (10 workers and 10
> diskers), but you map only the first 10.{since i did not get the point
> of the diskers ,as far as i understood ,
s and timeouts for cache_dirs? [I took
it also from online forum , can i leave it empty for both]
Do you see any ERRORs or WARNINGs in cache log? [NO error or warning found
in cache]
thank u so much !
From: Alex Rousskov
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 10:26 PM
Dears,
Kindly note that i have a lab, where the internet traffic is 100 Mb/s of pure
http targeted traffic, i m trying to achieve cache gain ratio of 60% , i was
able to do this using ufs cache dir and single worker.
But i found that i need to work with rock cache dir since the real traffic is
