Re: [squid-users] NetfilterInterception: NF > getsockopt(SO_ORIGINAL_DST) errors

2018-05-22 Thread kAja Ziegler
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 22/05/18 22:06, kAja Ziegler wrote: > > This is strange because I don't use any NAT iptables/netfilter rules on > > this server: > > > > [root@...]# iptables -n -L -v -t nat > > Chain PREROUTING (po

[squid-users] NetfilterInterception: NF > getsockopt(SO_ORIGINAL_DST) errors

2018-05-22 Thread kAja Ziegler
Hi, this question/problem is extracted from the other email "The right way how to increase max_filedescriptors on Linux". *- my environment:* CentOS 6.9 Squid 3.1.23 / 3.4.14 IPv4 and IPv6 addresses on interfaces *- error and warning messages from cache.log:* IpIntercept.cc(137) NetfilterInt

Re: [squid-users] The right way how to increase max_filedescriptors on Linux

2018-05-22 Thread kAja Ziegler
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 22/05/18 00:08, kAja Ziegler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to ask, if it is really needed to use ulimit or > > /etc/security/limits.conf to increase max_filedescriptors value? From my > > testing

[squid-users] The right way how to increase max_filedescriptors on Linux

2018-05-21 Thread kAja Ziegler
Hi, I want to ask, if it is really needed to use ulimit or /etc/security/limits.conf to increase max_filedescriptors value? From my testing, it seems not. *= my environment:* CentOS 6.9 Squid 3.1.23 / 3.4.14 *- default ulimits for root and other users:* [root@...]# ulimit -Sa | grep -- '-n'

Re: [squid-users] When the redirect [301, 302, 307] is cached by Squid?

2017-09-21 Thread kAja Ziegler
rcache zigi On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 21/09/17 22:16, kAja Ziegler wrote: > >> Thats what the "must-revalidate" means. It should work better with >> just max-age or Expires header - and with a longer value than 60 sec >

Re: [squid-users] When the redirect [301, 302, 307] is cached by Squid?

2017-09-21 Thread kAja Ziegler
our. zigi On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 21/09/17 20:36, kAja Ziegler wrote: > >> Hi Amos, >> >> 302 and 307 are not because as their status description indicates >> they are *temporary* results. They can only be cached if ther

Re: [squid-users] When the redirect [301, 302, 307] is cached by Squid?

2017-09-21 Thread kAja Ziegler
x86_64. With best regards, zigi On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 20/09/17 02:00, kAja Ziegler wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >>I want to ask why my Squid does not cache redirects 301, 302 and 307. >> See anomised example below. Even if I call the U

Re: [squid-users] When the redirect [301, 302, 307] is cached by Squid?

2017-09-21 Thread kAja Ziegler
t; http://ngtech.co.il/lmgtfy/ > Linux System Administrator > Mobile: +972-5-28704261 > Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il > > > From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On > Behalf Of kAja Ziegler > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 17:00 > To: squid-users@list

[squid-users] When the redirect [301, 302, 307] is cached by Squid?

2017-09-19 Thread kAja Ziegler
Hi all, I want to ask why my Squid does not cache redirects 301, 302 and 307. See anomised example below. Even if I call the URL more times or I open it in the browser, I always get MISS independently of the return code 301, 302 or 307. $ curl -v test.example.com/img307.jpg > GET /img307.jpg H