Re: [squid-users] CVE-2009-0801

2015-12-21 Thread dc
Am 19.12.2015 um 00:52 schrieb Amos Jeffries: > Why not? > * NAT/TPROXY is mandatory to happen on the Squid machine directly since > kernel and Squid are performing integrated operations. > * PROXY protocol passes the ORIGINAL_DST explicitly over the wire. > * SSL-Bump all happens "inside Squid".

Re: [squid-users] CVE-2009-0801

2015-12-18 Thread dc
Thank you very much for this detailed explanation! I have a setup where squid doesn't know about the original destination IP address, so I tried to enforce using DNS responses as destination addresses for any request, without success. Looking at the relevant code I found the limitation (and CVE) t

[squid-users] CVE-2009-0801

2015-12-18 Thread dc
Hello, please help me to understand the issue of CVE-2009-0801. Description of the CVE: "Squid, when transparent interception mode is enabled, uses the HTTP Host header to determine the remote endpoint, which allows remote attackers to bypass access controls for Flash, Java, Silverlight, and prob