Re: [squid-users] Squid performance 3.5.20 → 3.5.23

ver four runs each taking 3 hours. Testing both versions, I now see negligible difference between them. On 13 January 2017 at 10:10, Stephen Baynes wrote: > Is there a known performance fall off going 3.5.20 → 3.5.23? > > I am seeing a 15% to 20% performance drop on my normal download bench

[squid-users] Squid performance 3.5.20 → 3.5.23

Is there a known performance fall off going 3.5.20 → 3.5.23? I am seeing a 15% to 20% performance drop on my normal download benchmark and a crude test of uploading shows a few percent slowdown. Running on a Linux derived from Debian. Thanks -- Stephen Baynes

Re: [squid-users] Squid WCCP with multiple workers

Thanks for the suggestion of making wccp conditional on worker 1. Unfortunately it does not work. Stephen On 1 December 2014 at 08:38, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > fre 2014-11-28 klockan 10:28 + skrev Stephen Baynes: >> Is WCCP supposed to work with Squid multiple workers? > &g

[squid-users] Squid WCCP with multiple workers

kid3| Initialising all WCCPv2 lists With 2 worker we see the following in the cache log: 2014/11/28 09:44:09 kid1| Accepting WCCPv2 messages on port 2048, FD 16. 2014/11/28 09:44:09 kid1| Initialising all WCCPv2 lists Any thoughts? Thanks --

Re: [squid-users] Question on throughput

___ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > -- Stephen Baynes CEng MBCS CITP ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

[squid-users] How to tell when Squid has finished setting up disk cache directories?

o find out when it is finished creating the cache directories? Thanks Stephen Baynes ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users