Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Hi Amos, The patch is running since 3 days and seems working fine Can we expect the next squid build including the patch ? Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-7-cache-swap-high-bug-or-not-bug-tp4672750p4672835.html Sent from t

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Amos, With this type of config, we'll keep in cache all stale and popular objects, I think we need special options: save_big_file on/off save_big_file_min_size 128 MB save_big_file_max_time 1 years It'll be more clear and precise, can we count of these options soon ? Bye fred -- View this mes

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Amos, We do use "cache_replacement_policy heap LFUDA", so it should do the job as you explain, right ? If i understand you correctly, we should also use something like that "max_stale 1 year", correct ? Thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Amos, in the meantime, I was thinking another point: We know there are at least 2 limit with cache_dirs, the max size and the 16+ million entries (Filemap bits). the cache_swap_high should take care both. example: if the used cache is 95% of the space or if the Filemap bits is 95% of the 16+ milli

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Hi Amos, Is that possible to have a dedicated option with the Squid to keep objects in the cache if they're regulary used even if the time is expired ? Cleaning small expired files (<16kb) is not a problem but we must keep big files into the cache if often used. There are many "small" ISPs with 2,

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Hi Amos, Thanks for the explaination. We'll try to apply the patch and will test with the customer, keep you posted asap... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-7-cache-swap-high-bug-or-not-bug-tp4672750p4672800.html Sent from

[squid-users] refresh_pattern by type mime

Hi All, There is an existing case in the bugzilla (http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1913) speaking about this request and it seems a good idea: refresh_pattern by type mime It would be very nice and cool to have this feature in squid to define different min/max time per mime. We could

[squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Hi All, Maybe someone gets the info already... A refresh_pattern with 1 week maxi, if the same object is "visited" (coming from the squid cache) every day, will the object be deleted 1 week after the first cache action or will the squid add +1 week each time the object is used from the cache ? My

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Hi Amos, Any update ? This morning, it was crazy: *Percent used: 100.76%* How is it possible ? Then the squid has crashed and it's now cleaning objects. I can understand new objects could be added faster than the squid is able to clean older objects, but it seems there is something wrong in the

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Hi Amos, New check, 30 sec ago, same server: Store Directory #0 (aufs): /cachesdg/spool FS Block Size 4096 Bytes First level subdirectories: 16 Second level subdirectories: 256 Maximum Size: 67108864 KB Current Size: 67045256.00 KB *Percent Used: 99.91%* Filemap bits in use: 7962720 of 8388608 (95

[squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Hi All, I'm facing a weird situation with a squid *3.5.7*, have a look: Store Directory #0 (aufs): /cachesdg/spool FS Block Size 4096 Bytes First level subdirectories: 16 Second level subdirectories: 256 Maximum Size: 67108864 KB Current Size: 66288408.00 KB *Percent Used: 98.78%* Filemap bits in

Re: [squid-users] 2015/07/28 22:04:49 kid1| assertion failed: filemap.cc:50: "capacity_ <= (1 << 24)"

Hi Amos, /cache_dir aufs /cachesde/spool1 1560132 16 256 min-size=0 max-size=32768/ Will this bug be fixed in a near future, or do we have to increase the max-size to 128kb or more ? Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/2015-07-28-22-04-4

[squid-users] 2015/07/28 22:04:49 kid1| assertion failed: filemap.cc:50: "capacity_ <= (1 << 24)"

Hi All, Squid 3.5.6 in AUFS. Any idea why this error happens ? /2015/07/28 22:04:49 kid1| assertion failed: filemap.cc:50: "capacity_ <= (1 << 24)"/ Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/2015-07-28-22-04-49-kid1-assertion-failed-filemap-cc-50

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi Fred, No error, no crash. Some warnings only: 2015/07/21 11:21:02 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory But we can live with these warnings, Squid will take care the missing objects... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.10190

Re: [squid-users] How to get the correct size of a denied object ?

Amos, How do you get the real size at the moment with a normal object ? Just do the same I suppose you get the size from the headers, right ? If we know the object is denied, we ask for a head request to know the size and we use it in the log. As the object will be blocked, we don't care this act

Re: [squid-users] How to get the correct size of a denied object ?

Antony, I got this idea too, but here we "lose" (i mean it's not overwritten) the info in the access.log and there is no effect of realtime if you see what I mean... An alternative could to catch the TCP_DENIED with a helper but I did not find the way yet, i think it cannot be done this way. The e

[squid-users] How to get the correct size of a denied object ?

Hi All, As you know, when an object is denied by an ACl or other, the size of the object in the log file is the size of the ERR_* page. Is there a way to get the correct/real size of the blocked object ? I know the url is denied before squid gets the object from internet, but it should be nice to

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi Amos, Here is the cache.log to check: http://utimg.unveiltech.com/tmp/amos-cache.tgz Fred, I compared the 2 source diskd.cc, squid 3.4.8 and 3.5.6 both official, no dif. So, using the diskd 3.4 with the 3.5 does not seem to be a good idea, result should be the same. Fred -- View this messag

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi, By "cache.log saying objects are not found" I meant "DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory". (je n'avais plus le message en tete...) Yes, still this message but it disapears at least 30 minutes later. So not a problem to us with clients. bye Fred -- View this message

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Fred, The AUFS works for us, we switched all our clients back to the AUFS from DISKD. Yes, there are some Queue congestions at the squid restart (during 30 min maxi), but as Amos said the Squid will re-adapt its internal value to fit the traffic, I can confirm that point. After a while, the queue c

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi Fred, Same results from our side... Does it mean we should catch the diskd engine from the 3.4.x and apply it with the 3.5.x ? Should be a good try to see if it works bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p46

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Fred, Not sure we'll have free time for testing the previous 3.4, we now have dozens of boxes to manually upgrade to the 3.5.6... yes, we do use the original squid 3.5.6 package, no build mix here. Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-v

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Fred, We have upgraded 4 big ISPs to the latest 3.5.6 in AUFS, feedbacks are so good. I can tell you clients see a big (positive) change here. We use the same settings in the squid.conf but AUFS instead DISKD, the difference is crazy... In the past we moved to the Diskd due to too many errors in A

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi Fred, tests from my side: DISKD with TCP_HIT objects: 564KB/s with wget, the same url you have tested. AUFS with TCP_HITS objects: 47.8M/s, same wget, same squid, same url, same all. Wget with AUFS: Length: 10095849 (9.6M) [application/x-msdos-program] Saving to: `youtube_downloader_hd_setup-2.

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Fred, (Guys, 2 french Fred here, but not the sames) Did you check the TCP_HIT response times with the Diskd ? During our tests, we have seen than it's sometime better to download the object from internet again instead using the one from the cache, we got better response times... Fred -- View

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Amos, We're using the latest 3.5.6 build, and we have not yet planed new tests with the Rock. We were a bit disapointed with so we're not really "hot" to spend time in testing it. We're ok with the Diskd mode, except with the TCP_HIT objects (50+ times slower). We did tests on a basic server, i3

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi Fred, We did the tests with 1 hard disk only (for testing), we used 150 req/sec, load was around 0.7-0.8 Naaa, response times are crazy in DISKD/TCP_HIT (20+ sec instead 0.5 sec in AUFS) but it concerns TCP_HIT only, the other flags are corrects in DISKD. I'll try the "noatime"... Fred --

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi Fred, We did the tests with 1 hard disk only (for testing), we used 150 req/sec, load was around 0.7-0.8 Naaa, response times are crazy in DISKD/TCP_HIT (20+ sec instead 0.5 sec in AUFS) but it concerns TCP_HIT only, the other flags are corrects in DISKD. I'll try the "noatime"... Fred --

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Fred, Welcome to the club... -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672227.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi Amos, Sorry but the Rock mode is totaly bugged, the worst mode to use here. We did tons of tests, small, medium and big rock cache, all crash process after process. We have definitively abandonned the Rock mode while it'll be the same results. So, it seems we'll have to switch all boxes from d

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Yury, you mean that having the DISKD 52 times slower then AUFS with linux OS is normal ? I cannot believe that, incredible ! I could understand the double or the triple, but here we're speaking about 50+ times... Fred. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4

Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Yuri, Debian 7 or 8, tested on both... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672212.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users

[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

Hi All, I face a weird issue regarding DISKS cache-dir model and I would like to have your expertise here Here is the result of a cache object with an AUFS cache_dir: 1436916227.603462 192.168.1.88 00:0c:29:6e:2c:99 TCP_HIT/200 10486356 GET http://proof.ovh.net/files/10Mio.dat - HIER_NONE/-

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraries/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.545 - July 8th 2015. - Apple Music - new! - Google Music - new! - and more ... More details on ht

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi Amos, We did tons of tests with the latest Squid versions and this is not the behaviour with the "host_verify_strict off" and "client_dst_passthru off". With those 2 options OFF, we see a lot of ORIGINAL_DST that we should not see if we follow your explainations, so it seems there is a bug some

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Amos, OK, got your points. What I don't understand is: - The dns records do not match. Squid does the dns request by itself, downloads the object, delivers it to the client and flags with an ORIGINAL_DST, right ? - Same request from another client, same way, it'll be the same object and flagged OR

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Amos, You told the Squid will check the original dns from the headers, then it'll do its own dns resolution to verify they both match. So, if no match, Squid does the request to internet based on the dns it found. If I'm right, that the current way, correct ? What we could do is the same way but a

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi Amos, Can we expect a workaround to allow the object to the cache if the dns record is corrected by Squid instead that having an ORIGINAL_DST ? If Squid corrects the request, it mean the URL will be good, so we should be able to cache the object Fred -- View this message in context: http:

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi Yury, In your installation, with your devices... At home, I do the same like you, but I'm not an ISP. Here the issue is that end users could use different dns the ISPs cannot control. Home/Entreprise, the admin can control the used DNS servers with devices. In an ISP environment, we cannot con

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi Amos, "/You can get around it somewhat by having the ISP resolvers use each other same as proxy chains do./" This is impossible to do in a multi-level ISPs archi, because each ISP could use any DNS servers (google, level3, etc...). From the original end user to the latest ISP step the dns heade

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi Amos, 216.58.220.36 != www.google.com ??? Have a look: http://www.ip-adress.com/whois/216.58.220.36, this is google. Depending the DNS server used, the IP can change, we know that especialy due to BGP. In the case the client is an ISP providing internet to smaller ISPs with different DNS wit

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi, I'm back to this post because it still does not work. You explain "OFF - Squid selects a (possibly new, or not) IP to be used as the server (logs DIRECT).", sorry to say this is not the reality in the Squid. We have set the pass-thru directive to OFF and here is the result: TCP_MISS/206 72540

Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Hi, Could the issue be related to that ? TCP_MEM_HIT/200 224442 GET http://squid1/8b26b519d740afd8ec698b6af06efd8e17c6e5b6:8182/squid-internal-periodic/store_digest - HIER_NONE/- application/cache-digest Is it normal to see the store-digest as a MEM_HIT ? I say to the squid to do not reply with a

Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Amos, Yes, similar case here on the 4223. By reading the case 4223, we can see that part "Non-cacheable objects should never be added to the digest." from you. In my squid, there is no restriction, ICP is fully open, squid server (3.5.5) are compiled with the digest option, so all is done to allow

Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Amos, We used this example from the wiki: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/CacheHierarchy We can see a sibling/sibling archi is possible, right ? Here, we can not have a "cache_peer parent" archi as the tproxy (original user ip) will be lost at the parent level, you wrote this in a previous po

Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Hi, I disabled the sibling on both squid servers, we got one 504: TCP_MISS/504 361 GET http://rate.msfsob.com/review?h=www.searchhomeremedy.com - HIER_DIRECT/8.25.35.129 A wget on this url gives a 404, so here we can say the object does not exist, the TCP_MISS/504 seems a correct answer. But no new

Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Anthony, Amos, The 2 squid are kid/parent each of them (both sibling). So, when one aks the second, they play the role of kid -> parent, am I right ? Here is the way: Squid1 checks the Squid2 and gets that: ... user-ip TCP_MISS/504 708 GET http://code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.3/jquery-ui.js - CD_SIBLIN

Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Hi Antony, Correct, the kid contacts the parent that is getting a 504 and replies the same to the kid. That's why I suspect the parent tries to download by itself instead replying to the kid it does not have the object so the kid should do a fresh download from internet. examples: TCP_MISS/504 70

Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Hi Amos, Yep, i did not modify the TTL transaction. Here, it seems the parent (sibling mode) tries to do the request itself but faces an error (504 gateway timeout), it should answer to the kid it does not have the object (TCP_MISS) then the parent should download the object from internet. With thi

Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Hi Amos, 1. What does the 504 mean ? 2. How can i extend the TTL transaction ? Thanks :o) -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671946.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

[squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer

Hi All, is someone with an idea why it happens ? *TCP_MISS/504 708 GET http://www.myexamplecom/images/menu_hover_left.png - CD_SIBLING_HIT/x.x.x.x* i can see the TCP_MISS with the SIBLING only... i'm looking for this issue since several days and it makes me crazy thanks in advance. bye Fred -

[squid-users] TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 with SIBLING

Hi All, Weird issue with 2 Squid 3.5.5 in sibling mode, here is the trace: .. TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET http://www.greatandhra.com/ - SIBLING_HIT/x.x.x.x Any idea ? Thanks in advance for your inputs... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nab

Re: [squid-users] Squid cache_peer in tproxy

Hi Amos, Ok, it does confirm our tests. Is there a way to do this: users -> squid1 tproxy -> squid2/squid3 tproxy -> internet (seeing the user ips) ? or is it impossible ? in the wiki, there is an option "no-tproxy" in the cache_peer, it would be nice to have a "keep-tproxy" bye Fred -- Vie

[squid-users] Squid cache_peer in tproxy

Hi All, We're facing a weird issue with the cache_peer and tproxy. Squid 3.5.4 users -> squid1 -> squid2/squid3 -> internet squid1: http_port 3128 http_port 3129 tproxy icp_port 3130 cache_peer 192.168.1.2 parent 3128 3130 proxy-only weighted-round-robin background-ping no-digest cache_peer 19

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraries/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.528 - *June 1st 2015*. - New websites - YouTube mobile app improved More details on https://svb.

Re: [squid-users] How to cache Chrome Installer ?

Hi Yuri, the url does not change, i use the same url for the tests: http://r8---sn-n4g-jqbe.gvt1.com/edgedl/chrome/win/776B03BEAFB2810D/42.0.2311.152_chrome_installer.exe it should work with the storeid. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/How-to

Re: [squid-users] How to cache Chrome Installer ?

Hi Amos, By deleting the "Vary:*" from the headers, we should be able to cache the object, correct ? And by de-duplicating using the url until the "?", we get a single object. We do all the same YouTube also containing "user" data, so I don't see why it cannot work with this Chrome Installer url..

Re: [squid-users] How to cache Chrome Installer ?

Hi Yuri, Do you get a TCP_HIT with your rules ? From my side, i get this: *X-Cache: MISS* from blablabla... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/How-to-cache-Chrome-Installer-tp4671271p4671273.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing lis

[squid-users] How to cache Chrome Installer ?

Hi All, Has someone of you already cached this object ? *http://r8---sn-n4g-jqbe.gvt1.com/edgedl/chrome/win/776B03BEAFB2810D/42.0.2311.152_chrome_installer.exe* I know this is a dynamic object provided by Google, we tried with the StoreID by not yet able to get a TCP_HIT from Squid. If any idea,

Re: [squid-users] Cache peers with different load

Hi Amos, Thanks for the explainations Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Cache-peers-with-different-load-tp4671204p4671249.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [squid-users] Cache peers with different load

Hi Amos, OK, got it. But why a so big gap on the 2 parents ? The 3 squids are on the same range, connected to the same switch, all in 1Gb NIC. No problem if there are some MB difference, but here it's 10+ times more between 2 parents Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web

[squid-users] Cache peers with different load

Hi All, A crazy thing I cannot understand: - 3 squid 3.5.4 the child (172.10.1.1) is like that: cache_peer 172.10.1.2 parent 8182 8183 proxy-only weighted-round-robin background-ping no-tproxy cache_peer 172.10.1.3 parent 8182 8183 proxy-only weighted-round-robin background-ping no-tproxy ICP is

Re: [squid-users] Number of clients accessing cache: 0

Hi Amos, Well, as usual, you found the reason "client_db" was off, now it shows the numbers... Thanks Amos. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Number-of-clients-accessing-cache-0-tp4671102p4671117.html Sent from the Squid - Users maili

[squid-users] Number of clients accessing cache: 0

Hi All, Seems the number of connected clients is always 0 (zero) since the 3.5.3... We have tested with 10+ differents and simultaneous client ips and the number always shows 0. Latest tested build, the 3.5.4 official, still 0 as clients accessing the cache... Is there something wrong here ? Her

Re: [squid-users] assertion failed: comm.cc:557: "F->flags.open"

Hi Nathan, Thanks for the reply, I applied the latest build (squid.3.5.3-r13808), waiting for the client to check if it fixed or not Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/assertion-failed-comm-cc-557-F-flags-open-tp4670788p4670935.html Se

[squid-users] assertion failed: comm.cc:557: "F->flags.open"

Hi All, Is anyone with an trick regarding this error message in the cache.log ? *assertion failed: comm.cc:557: "F->flags.open"* Squid *3.5.3-20150415-r13798*. config in diskd, tproxy and ssl_bump. when the squid faces this error, it reloads itself but it breaks the surf for a while. Thanks in

Re: [squid-users] Random SSL bump DB corruption

Hi Amos, Good news ! Waiting for the new build, we'll test and keep you posted... Best regards. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Random-SSL-bump-DB-corruption-tp4670289p4670757.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at

Re: [squid-users] Random SSL bump DB corruption

Hi Guy, Thanks for answering :o) Based on the bugzilla, it's fixed but not yet available. Anyway, that's a very good news. Let's wait the next build. Thanks for your help. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Random-SSL-bump-DB-corrupti

Re: [squid-users] ***SPAM*** Re: Random SSL bump DB corruption

Hi All, No reply ? Do we have to leave with this mega/crazy bug ? Is there someone in the Squid team able to have a look to this problem or nobody care ? Thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Random-SSL-bump-DB-corrupt

Re: [squid-users] ***SPAM*** Re: Random SSL bump DB corruption

Hi Amos, All, We have done as you indicate, but the index.tx is still corrupted, have a look: *V 250406120057Z 2C564651B40D1F4F6CAFFF06EA8B201580E3B678 unknown /CN=173.194.65.84+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 250406120057Z 71664F2E27C4E321B2A4F59EA3971D70

Re: [squid-users] ***SPAM*** Re: Random SSL bump DB corruption

compatible with the new squid 3.5.x ssl_bump options ? Bye Fred De : Yuri Voinov [via Squid Web Proxy Cache] [mailto:ml-node+s1019090n4670662...@n4.nabble.com] Envoyé : jeudi 9 avril 2015 15:03 À : Stakres Objet : Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Random SSL bump DB corruption -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [squid-users] Random SSL bump DB corruption

Hi Yuri, We have checked the sslproxy_capath, all certifs updated. OpenSSL is: OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013 (Debian 7.8) Additional point, the auto-signed certif is a 1024, could it be the problem ? Maybe we need to use the ssl_crtd with the option "-b 1024" what do you think ? example of corrupte

Re: [squid-users] Random SSL bump DB corruption

Hi All, Yury, Facing the same problem at the moment with the squid 3.5.3, around 150 req/sec. The SSL crash 5 min later with the error. index.txt: V 15062300Z 7EE07E84896D06865495B87A061C4C55D03E428D unknown /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.appspot

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi Amos, We have done additional tests in production with ISPs and the ORIGINAL_DST in tproxy cannot be cached. In normal mode (not tproxy), ORIGINAL_DST can be cached, no problem. But once in tproxy (http_port 3128 tproxy), no way, it's impossible to get TCP_HIT. We have played with the client_d

[squid-users] assertion failed: Read.cc:205: "params.data == data"

Hi All, Strange problem during surf, squid 3.5.3, 64bits, Debian 7.8: *2015/04/01 19:19:06 kid3| assertion failed: Read.cc:205: "params.data == data"* caches: workers 3 cache_dir rock /var/spool/squid3r1 166400 min-size=0 max-size=65536 swap-timeout=500 max-swap-rate=200/sec if ${process_number}

Re: [squid-users] Open Squid Box - FREE

Hi Amos, This is not a LiveCD, this is a *complete solution* including Squid, web console, statistics, graphs, StoreID plugin, etc... An Open solution for people who needs an all-in-one system ready and running in 10 min maxi... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy

[squid-users] Open Squid Box - FREE

*WAN Optimization and Internet Acceleration in Open Source*. OpenSquidBox is an Open Source of an already pre-configured Squid Proxy Cache Server under Linux that can be installed within few minute. It’s an ISO Software Appliance that can be loaded on any hardware and virtual appliance. It contains

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.39 - March 13th 2015. - New websites - Tiny bugs fixed More details on https://svb.unveiltech.co

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi Eliezer, Well, we have done many tests with Squid (3.1 to 3.5.x), disabling "client_dst_passthru" (off) will stop the DNS entry as explained in the wiki, the option directly acts on the flag "ORIGINAL_DST". As you know, ORIGINAL_DST switches the optimization off (ex: StoreID) then it's not poss

[squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Hi All, Does someone know why the "*client_dst_passthru*" does not work in TProxy mode ? From the Squid wiki, we can read that: "/Regardless of this option setting, when dealing with intercepted traffic Squid will verify the Host: header and any traffic which fails Host verification will be treat

Re: [squid-users] Resolution Locker Plugin for Squid Proxy Cache 3.x

Hi All, New build 2.07 : - YouTube - Vevo - Vimeo - iMDB - Dailymotion - Break.com - Apple Trailers Ask your free 1 year license on the website Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.na

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.35 - February 22th 2015. - New websites More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy Bye F

Re: [squid-users] Resolution Locker Plugin for Squid Proxy Cache 3.x

Hi All, New build 2.06 : - YouTube - Vevo - iMDB - Dailymotion - Break.com - Apple Trailers Ask your free 1 year license on the website Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.33 - February 8th 2015. - New websites More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy Bye Fr

Re: [squid-users] Resolution Locker Plugin for Squid Proxy Cache 3.x

Hi All, New build 2.05 including Dailymotion... Still a free 1 year license on the website Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Resolution-

[squid-users] Resolution Locker Plugin for Squid Proxy Cache 3.x

Hi All, SquidVideoLocker for Squid Proxy Cache is a plugin that locks and limits video resolutions of YouTube, Vevo and iMDB. The plugin takes into account all video formats, all resolutions from 144p up to 2160p. Reduce video resolutions from YouTube, Vevo and iMDB to the lower existing resoluti

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.31 including new websites and bug fix - January 28th 2015. More details on https://svb.unveiltech.

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.27 including new websites - January 19th 2015. More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Yuri, Do not worry, I need more ot be offended Yes regexp is great but this is not clear for all, I mean they have to understand regexp and speak Perl... Nice to see you reach 70% with your rules, I really doubt about the 70% with those simple rules but I'm ready to believe you. Maybe you could

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi Yuri, Does the "we don't need" means "you don't need" or do you speak for all users of Squid ? We have done tons of tests with the "storeid_file_rewrite", sorry to tell you it does not achieve 70% because: - The prog you provide is nude, I mean there is 1 example only - Admins have to check hu

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache for Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. By default your existing Squid Proxy Cache cannot properly cache most popular multi-media websites like YouTube, Netflix, Facebook, DailyMotion, Vimeo, Vevo, Google Maps & Apps, Apple, Tumbl

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, New build version 2.20 - December 21th 2014 - New option "*-ytd*" to enable the caching function with YouTube Downloader tools - New websites added More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy... Bye Fred -- View this mess

Re: [squid-users] Determining unique clients in Squid

Proxy Cache] [mailto:ml-node+s1019090n4668773...@n4.nabble.com] Envoyé : vendredi 19 décembre 2014 15:43 À : Stakres Objet : Determining unique clients in Squid Hi, I have been trying to understand, how does Squid determine different clients, but it is not clear from the documentation. I guess

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, New build 2.17 with additional website... Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4668738.h

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, New build 2.16 taking care new websites in de-duplication... Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi Ahmed, I could not answer concerning the SMP 32KB caching limitation, Amos and/or Eliezer should be the right persons here to answer you. Regarding the SquidVideoBooster, this is a plugin to Squid. If you Squid supports the SMP so the SquidVideoBooster will work. Reminder, the SquidVideoBoost

Re: [squid-users] Help with Windows updates

Hi JP, Have you tried the SquidVideoBooster ? It takes care Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 including Windows Update and hundred of other websites. https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster Link to the news

[squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster

Hi All, Just to let you know the SquidVideoBooster is now compatible with Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 to speed up your Video, Music, Image files, Libraries (Jquery, Bootstrap, etc...), Software Updates (Windows Update, Apple, Android, etc...), Smartphone/Tablet Apps, CDNs. It'll help you to save more t

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster

Hi All, New build 2.12 available. - New websites added - New option "-shakir" to boost speedtest.net Enjoy Dedicated website about SquidVideBooster and licensing: http://www.unveiltech.com/indexsquidvideobooster.php Bye Fred -- View

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster

Eliezer, Good to know We indicate in the readme.txt the distri. we hve tested: *Note: Currently SquidVideoBooster is available for Linux Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Suse, etc... Secific Linux distribution can be provided on demand. * Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-p

  1   2   >