I hung onto CentOS 6 for a while but it’s no longer secure enough. You really
ought to move versions.
I would prefer to see Eliezer efforts used to make 4.2 available in the stable
repo.
Thanks
Mike
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Eliezer Cr
I am sure Amos wont mind me saying but nginx is the right tool for that
scenario.
Squid is a great forward proxy and I use it for our network but form incoming
connections nginx is more flexible and designed for the job.
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@l
Hi Eliezer
I have been using your repos on CentOS for many years thank you for your hard
work.
Are you planning a stable repo for v4 now it's out.
Many Thanks
Mike
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cac
Just to say I have been using Eliezers centos repo for a few years as the
centos/rhel repos are always slow to react to new versions.
I think Eliezers repos are well respected out there.
Regards
Mike
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org]
ginal Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Sent: 16 March 2017 10:54
To: Mike Surcouf; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] kerb auth groups KV note acl config
On 16/03/2017 11:12 p.m., Mike Surcouf wrote:
> @Amos
>
> Thanks for this
>
-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] kerb auth groups KV note acl config
On 15/03/2017 10:18 p.m., Mike Surcouf wrote:
> This is bulleted as a new feature for v4.
> Yet there is no way to test this without a quick reply letting me know the
> basic usage.
> Anyone got
This is bulleted as a new feature for v4.
Yet there is no way to test this without a quick reply letting me know the
basic usage.
Anyone got a snippet on how this is setup
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Surcouf
s-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] Im
> Auftrag von Mike Surcouf
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März 2017 18:58
> An: 'Rafael Akchurin'; Amos Jeffries;
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Betreff: Re: [squid-users] microsoft edge and proxy auth not working
>
> Hi Rafael
>
>
Ah OK sorry
I am curious why you have a reason to use NTLM over Kerberos? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Akchurin [mailto:rafael.akchu...@diladele.com]
Sent: 09 March 2017 18:01
To: Mike Surcouf
Cc: Amos Jeffries; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users
Hi Rafael
Is there any reason you can't use Kerberos.
Note you will need to create a keytab but the setup is not that hard and in the
docs.
I use it very successfully on window AD network.
auth_param negotiate program /usr/lib64/squid/negotiate_kerberos_auth
auth_param negotiate children 20
auth
@Markus
I would really like to give this a go.
Good to get some people using this stuff
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Surcouf
Sent: 07 March 2017 15:21
To: 'squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org'
Subje
Outputting the groups as KV pairs in AD environments on auth seems like a
great performance enhancement and will allow me to ditch my ldap lookups.
Is there any docs on how to set this up?
Even looking at the source I can't seem to work it out.
I would like to test and potentially contribute to t
12 matches
Mail list logo
