Amos
Got the build working finally and the cxx Maxtcp flag shows in my -v but
still getting the 128 port limit!
What a let down Thought I had it for a moment.
On Monday, September 7, 2015, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 8/09/2015 2:11 p.m., Jason Enzer wrote:
> > trying to build
trying to build in larger maxtcplistenports into 3.5.7 for centos 6
what would i need out of here to get a build working? i mean like it
does from elizers repo?
./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--program-prefix= --prefix=/
runninng
./configure CXXFLAGS="-DMAXTCPLISTENPORTS=200" when i make install
squid is not showing me the increased listen ports.
squid -v shows
Squid Cache: Version 3.5.7
Service Name: squid
configure options: '--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu'
'--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--target=x86_64-re
not a popular topic i guess. can anyone point in the right direction
for setting up multiple squid instances on centos 6.6?
thanks,
jason
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Jason Enzer wrote:
> if i had 250+ ip addresses and wanted to run a large anonymous proxy
> server what is th
if i had 250+ ip addresses and wanted to run a large anonymous proxy
server what is the best practice? i know there is a 128 port limit on
squid and i can increase max http port setting and rebuild squid. is
that best practice?
should i run multiple instances of squid on same server?
i have a qua
is this possible?
i have src acl working fine. i can control the outgoing address/port
and incoming address with no issues.
when i introduce ncsa auth it breaks everything.
acl ncsa_users proxy_auth REQUIRED
http_access allow ncsa_users
acl src3171 src 23.240
acl port3171 myportname 3171
tcp_o
sorry for the repost. putting the whole config up. maybe someone can
spot the issue.
I have a single source address I want access to 10 ips.
I also have a single source address I want to access 1 ip.
The 1:1 works fine
The 1:10 acl is off.. I can connect to the ip:port fine and it works
fine, bu
nt still shows outgoing address from first acl statement... if i
comment out the first acl the 2nd acl works and the outgoing address
is what is expected.
stumped!
-jason
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 11:13:02 -0700, Jason Enzer wrote:
>
>>
T have a single source address I want access to 10 ips.
I also have a single source address I want to access 1 ip.
The 1:1 works fine
The 1:10 acl is off.. I can connect to the ip:port fine and it works
fine, but the outgoing address is always the one from the 1st acl.
Can someone please help? I
