Re: [squid-users] IPVS/LVS load balancing Squid servers, anyone did it?

2-5-28704261 > Email: ngtech1...@gmail.com > > -Original Message- > From: squid-users On Behalf Of > FUSTE Emmanuel > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 2:23 PM > To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > Subject: Re: [squid-users] IPVS/LVS load balancing Squid servers, anyon

Re: [squid-users] IPVS/LVS load balancing Squid servers, anyone did it?

Hi, To complement this, on modern kernel take the opportunity to try nftlb instead of LVS too. https://www.zevenet.com/knowledge-base/nftlb/what-is-nftlb/ Emmanuel. Le 27/08/2020 à 06:35, Bruce Rosenberg a écrit : > Hi Eliezer, > > We are running a couple of Squid proxies (the real servers) in

Re: [squid-users] help to disconnect users after determinated time. TTL

Le 13/08/2019 à 16:44, jmperrote a écrit : > Hello, we have a squid reverse proxy, and use the param "auth_param > basic credentialsttl 10 minutes" to disconnect users that are inactive > for a time, but this NOT work, because later a users validated on a > reverse proxy can continue navigating

Re: [squid-users] Memory leak

> Instead of installing a fake local DNS server and using > dns_nameservers 127.0.0.1 > I could use > dns_nameservers none > Squid warn about non usable DNS and proceed normally. Before (tested > with 3.5.12 and lower) Squid hang. > > So, I am missing something ? Is it a know

[squid-users] Memory leak (was: Squid 3.x never_direct and DNS requests problem.)

Le 24/01/2017 à 10:55, FUSTE Emmanuel a écrit : > Le 23/01/2017 à 23:41, Amos Jeffries a écrit : >> On 24/01/2017 3:58 a.m., FUSTE Emmanuel wrote: >>> All was carefully checked and nothing in my configuration (acl etc ...) >>> explain why Squid insist to do DNS request

Re: [squid-users] annotation and fast / slow acl

Le 21/06/2017 à 19:17, Amos Jeffries a écrit : > On 22/06/17 04:51, FUSTE Emmanuel wrote: >> So arbitrary k- v pair not used by the acl helper protocol could be >> matched against with the note acl ? >> How it relate to the defined/reserved tag= and clt_conn_tag= keywords

Re: [squid-users] annotation and fast / slow acl

Hello, One more question to be sure to understand some details: > Le 20/06/2017 à 14:46, Amos Jeffries a écrit : >> On 20/06/17 22:55, FUSTE Emmanuel wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I need to select a cache peer based on the user group. >>> As cache_p

Re: [squid-users] annotation and fast / slow acl

Hello, Thank you, it help a lot and clarify things. Emmanuel. Le 20/06/2017 à 14:46, Amos Jeffries a écrit : > On 20/06/17 22:55, FUSTE Emmanuel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I need to select a cache peer based on the user group. >> As cache_peer_access need a fast acl t

Re: [squid-users] annotation and fast / slow acl

Le 20/06/2017 à 12:55, FUSTE Emmanuel a écrit : > Hello, > > I need to select a cache peer based on the user group. > As cache_peer_access need a fast acl to have predicable result, I tried to > - annotate transactions with "note" > - match the annotation with a fas

[squid-users] annotation and fast / slow acl

Hello, I need to select a cache peer based on the user group. As cache_peer_access need a fast acl to have predicable result, I tried to - annotate transactions with "note" - match the annotation with a fast acl - use the acl in the cache_peer_access directive But I still got warning about slow a

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.x never_direct and DNS requests problem.

Le 23/01/2017 à 23:41, Amos Jeffries a écrit : > On 24/01/2017 3:58 a.m., FUSTE Emmanuel wrote: >> All was carefully checked and nothing in my configuration (acl etc ...) >> explain why Squid insist to do DNS requests for requests forwarded to >> the peer(s)

[squid-users] Squid 3.x never_direct and DNS requests problem.

Hello, I'm in a context where I have a lot of Squid installation without direct internet access. All queries are forwarded to an Internet connected peer. Recently, I migrate my old 2.x Squid to 3.x and take responsibility for some other 3.x existing installations. - my Debian based Squid 3.4.8