he DC. It is what I have observed, but perhaps I'm
missing something.
So I need to be sure of this detail because we need to reduce the authentication
load of some Active Directories (which previously used NTLM), and Kerberos seems
to be the solution. By telling me
to starve any MITM of information it might use to reliably affect changes to
> the
> client tokens.
This is the point I don't understand. Could you tell me more ?
Thanks
--
Emmanuel Coirier
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
tunnel exchange)
It this behavior endorsed, or is it a bug ?
Actually, I know that browsers seem not to care, but they won't be able to care
if they don't receive all the needed information.
Thanks for reading and your response :-)
--
Emmanuel Coirier
__
