Re: [squid-users] Squid 6.10 SSL-Bump Woes

2024-10-11 Thread Bryan Seitz
   I wanted to note that since these are BMCs they require basic auth headers to return their response. I noticed that the ignore-auth option was removed awhile ago.  Is my only option to go back to Squid 3.5 ? TIA, Bryan Seitz On Oct 11, 2024 at 4:17 AM -0400, Amos Jeffries , wrote: > On 11/10

Re: [squid-users] Squid 6.10 SSL-Bump Woes

2024-10-11 Thread Bryan Seitz
root@squid:~# curl -i --insecure --proxy http://squid:3128/ " https://10.170.31.75/redfish/v1/Oem/Supermicro/HGX_H100/Systems/HGX_Baseboard_0/Processors/GPU_SXM_4/ProcessorMetrics " HTTP/1.1 200 Connection established HTTP/1.1 200 OK Link: ; rel=de

Re: [squid-users] Squid 6.10 SSL-Bump Woes

2024-10-11 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 2024-10-10 20:48, Jonathan Lee wrote: miss means it stored items Just to correct a misunderstanding: A cache miss does _not_ imply that Squid stored the response. Alex. On Oct 10, 2024, at 15:27, Bryan Seitz wrote:  I removed the header mods and changed the refresh pattern to: refr