Thanks for your reply Alex.
On 27/06/24 23:06, Alex Rousskov wrote:
and how your traffic tickles them, SMP Squid without atomic locks might
become very slow! We do not (and, IMO, should not) optimize performance
for environments without lock-free atomics!
I see the following options for going
On 2024-06-27 10:35, Nishant Sharma wrote:
I am running squid 6.10 on Openwrt 23.05.2, which is cross compiled for
ramips / mipsel_24kc which has a 32 bit CPU (MT7621A) with 2 cores and 2
threads.
Squid fails to start in SMP mode when I set workers > 1.
The assertion in question may be over
I have Squid 5.8 I can’t start it with multiple workers enabled in pfSense
also. It is a 64bit 2100MAX
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 27, 2024, at 08:12, Nishant Sharma wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am running squid 6.10 on Openwrt 23.05.2, which is cross compiled for
> ramips / mipsel_24kc which ha
Has anyone ran this on a Banana Pi r3 or r4?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 27, 2024, at 08:12, Nishant Sharma wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am running squid 6.10 on Openwrt 23.05.2, which is cross compiled for
> ramips / mipsel_24kc which has a 32 bit CPU (MT7621A) with 2 cores and 2
> threads.
>
Hello,
I am running squid 6.10 on Openwrt 23.05.2, which is cross compiled for
ramips / mipsel_24kc which has a 32 bit CPU (MT7621A) with 2 cores and 2
threads.
Squid fails to start in SMP mode when I set workers > 1.
SMP worked fine with squid 4.13 on same architecture.
I have filed a bug
