Alex,
On 20/05/2024 22:09, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 2024-05-20 03:35, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote:
>
>> In SMP mode, is it possible that cache_mem can be share among
>> multiple squid instances with the same service_name?
>
> Short answer: "Do not run multiple SMP Squid instances with the same
On 2024-05-17 09:51, Andre Bolinhas wrote:
Alex can you reply this please
Already did. Please see
https://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2024-May/026677.html
Alex.
Hi
Well, the performance and NTLM issues that I had with persistent
connections goes back to squid 3.5 😳, so I
On 2024-05-20 03:35, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote:
In SMP mode, is it possible that cache_mem can be share among
multiple squid instances with the same service_name?
Short answer: "Do not run multiple SMP Squid instances with the same
service_name".
SMP Squid cache[1] is not supposed to be sh
Hi All,
In SMP mode, is it possible that cache_mem can be share among multiple squid
instances with the same service_name?
Per SmpScale[1], "memory object cache (in most environments)" can be share
among workers
Per smp-enabled-squid[2], "Each set of SMP-aware processes will interact only
with
