Thank you, you've enlightened me;
I had the GlobalWhitelistDSTNet directive declared twice in two
different includes
This meant that an identical Acl declared in two different places would
contradict each other on the same addresses and generate mass warnings.
On 02/10/2023 22:01, Alex Roussko
Since Squid 6.x we have this strange behavior on acl dst
Many warnings is generated
2023/10/02 20:18:50| WARNING: You should probably remove '64.34.72.226' from
the ACL named 'GlobalWhitelistDSTNet'
2023/10/02 20:18:50| WARNING: (B) '64.34.72.226' is a subnetwork of (A)
'64.34.72.226'
2023/1
Hi
Since Squid 6.x we have this strange behavior on acl dst
Many warnings is generated
2023/10/02 20:18:50| WARNING: You should probably remove '64.34.72.226'
from the ACL named 'GlobalWhitelistDSTNet'
2023/10/02 20:18:50| WARNING: (B) '64.34.72.226' is a subnetwork of (A)
'64.34.72.226'
2023
Thank you Amos and Rafael,
Using the LinuxDnat approach worked great as well.
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 5:18 AM Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 30/09/23 11:06, Fernando Giorgetti wrote:
> > If someone has already done that, with the client running in a different
> > machine, I would love to know how.
>
* Amos Jeffries :
That is false. Squid writes as much information as it can about the problem
to log, stderr, and if possible the system message log. There is nothing
else a process like Squid can do.
On 02.10.23 11:01, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Squid COULD have initialized the DB itself.
That's
* Stuart Henderson :
> In the cache db case: it _doesn't_ know what is wrong. Perhaps it is
> indeed because the DB hasn't been initialised (though it may not have
> access permissions to create the db anyway)
r it might be the wrong path.
>, but it could equally be
> that a partition is not mou
On 2023-10-02, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Squid COULD have initialized the DB itself.
> That's the criticism I'm willing to allow.
> If it KNOWS what's wrong, why not "fix" it itself.
In the cache db case: it _doesn't_ know what is wrong. Perhaps it is
indeed because the DB hasn't been initialise
* Amos Jeffries :
> On 2/10/23 10:28, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> > Squid's user friendliness could use a major overhaul.
>
> Agreed. As one of the people trying to do that for the past decade ... any
> suggestions of better wording are welcome.
But you have to admit this: I read the error message (I
On 2/10/23 10:28, Dave Blanchard wrote:
Squid's user friendliness could use a major overhaul.
Agreed. As one of the people trying to do that for the past decade ...
any suggestions of better wording are welcome.
I absolutely despise programs which are designed this way.
Ah, there we have
Please, everyone, let's keep the discussion civil; insulting other
participants will not achieve anything good for anyone.
On the merit of the conversation: Squid is the result of the work and
passion of countless people (including myself and many other participants
to this forum) who contribute t
On 02.10.23 02:07, Dave Blanchard wrote:
I'm in no mood for your bullshit.
GTFO then, go and pay for software with support.
I am just user and this is user forum, not paid support line.
Pretending as if the daemon has successfully launched but just silently failing
with no warning, then requ
I'm in no mood for your bullshit. Pretending as if the daemon has successfully
launched but just silently failing with no warning, then requiring me to jump
through hoops to dig up some completely meaningless error message that I have
to Google for is OBVIOUSLY NOT how it's done.
Every other p
12 matches
Mail list logo
