On 9/12/22 18:20, roee klinger wrote:
Thank you for your advice, as suggested I tested a both TCP and UDP, and
found TCP to be so slow
that is it practically unusable, UDP however works fine, but has the
normal disadvantages of UDP.
Glad that test yielded useful results in your environment!
Hello,
Thank you for your advice, as suggested I tested a both TCP and UDP, and found
TCP to be so slow
that is it practically unusable, UDP however works fine, but has the normal
disadvantages of UDP.
It seems that TCP sends each message by itself, and UDP sends them in bulk
(10-20 at a time)
Hi Amos,
thanks for your answer. It's a new point to look at and brings me one step
further.
Kind regards,
Hannes
Von: squid-users im Auftrag von
Amos Jeffries
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. September 2022 06:45
An: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] Re: [squid-users] Exchange
Hello Amos
Thank you for looking in to this. Below is the configuration ...
###
logformat squid %tl %6tr %>a %Hs %h
cache_access_log /var/log/squid/access.log squid
pid_filename /var/run/squid.pid
visible_hostname nuance-ak-client-test2
acl Safe_ports port 80
acl Safe
He Xavier,
I believe that there are couple logformat options that you should add to
understand better this issue.
The first thing in this scenario is to have the squid.conf and access.log
output.
If you have a load of about 100 rps you shouldn't be required to have more then
1-2 workers tops.
