[squid-users] deny squid to bump deny_info

2021-12-07 Thread André Bolinhas
Hi We use Squid v5 with ssl_bump to decrypt only google domains. With a special configuration we also need to deny important websites. So far so good, but for performance reasons we don't want Squid to return the error pages. Since we have a lot of denied sites, it seems that Squid tries to bump r

Re: [squid-users] process_name macro usage

2021-12-07 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 12/7/21 1:47 PM, senor wrote: > What I'm really wanting though is which directives can be safely > omitted from the disker and coordinator process config > I'm open to alternative methods and agree that those processes should > not act on directives that are not useful. I do not have a list,

Re: [squid-users] process_name macro usage

2021-12-07 Thread senor
Thanks Amos and Alex, I am aware of those 2 links. They are the basis for what I think I know so far. What I'm really wanting though is which directives can be safely omitted from the disker and coordinator process config. As Amos pointed out there is the possibility of inadvertently allowing t

Re: [squid-users] Squid 4.16, docker many CLOSE_WAIT

2021-12-07 Thread FredB
s, but it may be the same. > > Needless to say, bugs notwithstanding, too small client_lifetime > values > will kill too many innocent transactions. Please see my first > response Yes It's just for testing purpose, I'm seeing no impact but only for my usage case ... For now I will try client_lif

Re: [squid-users] process_name macro usage

2021-12-07 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 12/7/21 6:27 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > The directives relevant to SMP-awareness are listed at > https://wiki.squid-cache.org/MultipleInstances I do not see information on SMP awareness of modern Squid features on the above wiki page. There is a lot more info about that at https://wiki.squid-c

Re: [squid-users] Squid 4.16, docker many CLOSE_WAIT

2021-12-07 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 12/7/21 6:13 AM, FredB wrote: > Do you think, client lifetime 1 minute works (there is no minimal value > in documentation) IIRC, Squid does not impose any special restrictions on client_lifetime values. The type of that directive is time-units. In Squid v5+, that time-units type is documented

Re: [squid-users] process_name macro usage

2021-12-07 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 7/12/21 18:10, senor wrote: Hi All, I'm attempting to use the process_name macro in include file names to isolate the worker-specific directives from the disker and coordinator. I have not found any references to directives that are required by those 2 processes. I'm currently doing a tria

Re: [squid-users] Squid 4.16, docker many CLOSE_WAIT

2021-12-07 Thread FredB
Do you think, client lifetime 1 minute works (there is no minimal value in documentation) For testing purpose I'm trying in a test platform and I'm seeing no impact, for example download a large file is not interrupted There is no error in squid parse but I found nothing in debug about lifet

Re: [squid-users] Squid 4.16, docker many CLOSE_WAIT

2021-12-07 Thread FredB
Le 07/12/2021 à 08:11, FredB a écrit : Thanks, I will try with one proxy FI: The close_wait are well deleted, but I don't know if there is an important impact or not for my users My browser was still connected to a secure website, but I did nothing _