Re: [squid-users] squid 5 and parent peers

2021-10-08 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/8/21 8:02 PM, Markus Moeller wrote: > I try to setup a proxy chain, but don't get the setup right. I have one > squid with 2 parents. One with auth for domainA.com and one w/o auth for > the non local IPs (i.e. Internet). > With the below config I see domainA.com still going to the > unauth

[squid-users] squid 5 and parent peers

2021-10-08 Thread Markus Moeller
Hi, I try to setup a proxy chain, but don't get the setup right. I have one squid with 2 parents. One with auth for domainA.com and one w/o auth for the non local IPs (i.e. Internet). With the below config I see domainA.com still going to the unauthenticated parent proxy. Any hint why ?

Re: [squid-users] [SPAM] [ext] Squid 5.1 memory usage

2021-10-08 Thread Steve Hill
On 08/10/2021 10:24, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but some workers are growing pretty large. I'm using ICAP and SSL bump. https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug

Re: [squid-users] Squid 5.1 memory usage

2021-10-08 Thread Steve Hill
On 08/10/2021 15:50, Alex Rousskov wrote: It there a way to list all of the Comm::Connection objects? The exact answer is "no", but you can use mgr:filedescriptors as an approximation. I've had to restart this process now (but I'm sure the problem will be back next week). I did use netstat

Re: [squid-users] [SPAM] [ext] Squid 5.1 memory usage

2021-10-08 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Odhiambo Washington : > > > I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd > > > expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but > > some > > > workers are growing pretty large. I'm using ICAP and SSL bump. > > > > https://bugs.squid-cache.org/sho

Re: [squid-users] Squid 5.1 memory usage

2021-10-08 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/8/21 4:56 AM, Steve Hill wrote: > > I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1.  Caching is disabled, so I'd > expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but > some workers are growing pretty large.  I'm using ICAP and SSL bump. As Ralf Hildebrandt mentioned, this is

[squid-users] Squid 5.1 memory usage

2021-10-08 Thread Steve Hill
I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but some workers are growing pretty large. I'm using ICAP and SSL bump. I've got a worker using 5 GB which I've collected memory stats from - the things

Re: [squid-users] Portal Splash Page - exceptions

2021-10-08 Thread MATYAS, Tibor
Hi Amos, thank you for your support. It is working now! ... ### VoIP/PBX always allow acl voip_domains dstdomain "/etc/squid/voip_domains.exclude" cache deny voip_domains always_direct allow voip_domains http_access allow intlan voip_domains --> *last line here was missing* ### Splash/Policy STA

Re: [squid-users] [SPAM] [ext] Squid 5.1 memory usage

2021-10-08 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:24 PM Ralf Hildebrandt < ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote: > * Steve Hill : > > > > I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd > > expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but > some > > workers are growing pretty l

Re: [squid-users] [SPAM] [ext] Squid 5.1 memory usage

2021-10-08 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Steve Hill : > > I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1. Caching is disabled, so I'd > expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was under Squid 3.5), but some > workers are growing pretty large. I'm using ICAP and SSL bump. https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5132 is somewhat

Re: [squid-users] Squid 5.1 memory usage

2021-10-08 Thread David Touzeau
Hi Just to mention, we discover high memory usage too without ICAP and SSL bump after several days, need to restart the service. Le 08/10/2021 à 10:56, Steve Hill a écrit : I'm seeing high memory usage on Squid 5.1.  Caching is disabled, so I'd expect memory usage to be fairly low (and it was