Re: [squid-users] Guidance needed. Issues with WPAD and Firefox

2019-10-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 3/10/19 5:55 pm, Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:47 PM Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises wrote: >> >> Hi, maybe somebody here experienced the same issues while working with >> WPAD files. >> >> I have a working Centos 7.6/SQUID v4.8 that works as expected.

Re: [squid-users] Guidance needed. Issues with WPAD and Firefox

2019-10-02 Thread Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:47 PM Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises wrote: > > Hi, maybe somebody here experienced the same issues while working with > WPAD files. > > I have a working Centos 7.6/SQUID v4.8 that works as expected. > It works as long as I manually configure the proxy in the network

[squid-users] Guidance needed. Issues with WPAD and Firefox

2019-10-02 Thread Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises
Hi, maybe somebody here experienced the same issues while working with WPAD files. I have a working Centos 7.6/SQUID v4.8 that works as expected. It works as long as I manually configure the proxy in the network settings of each workstation (windows) firefox browser 69.0.1 (64bit) and the same beh

Re: [squid-users] Annotating transaction from inside ICAP

2019-10-02 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/2/19 2:51 PM, johnr wrote: > I was wondering how / if it was possible to annotate a request from > within an ICAP service. A long-term solution requires two steps: 1. Modify your ICAP service to return a custom ICAP response header. 2. Modify Squid to treat ICAP response headers (with na

[squid-users] Annotating transaction from inside ICAP

2019-10-02 Thread johnr
Hi, I was wondering how / if it was possible to annotate a request (basically, set a note/tag similarly to how the external ACL can) from within an ICAP service. My use-case is that I would like to add a note with information about the request that is then available for use within external helper

Re: [squid-users] Fw: [Bug 4977] stmem.cc:98: "lowestOffset () <= target_offset" assertion when adapting Content-Range value

2019-10-02 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/2/19 10:50 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 02.10.19 16:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 > OK, now I've got 1.7G pcap,  2.8M access.log (22k requests) and cache.log > saying when did the problem appear. > Any idea what to search for?

Re: [squid-users] Fw: [Bug 4977] stmem.cc:98: "lowestOffset () <= target_offset" assertion when adapting Content-Range value

2019-10-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 02.10.19 16:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: related to http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 (In reply to Matus UHLAR - fantomas from comment #12) > We notice the same problem after few minutes running squid 4.6 (debian 10, > x86_64): > > 2019/10/02 05:00:53 kid1| asser

[squid-users] Fw: [Bug 4977] stmem.cc:98: "lowestOffset () <= target_offset" assertion when adapting Content-Range value

2019-10-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Hello, related to http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 (In reply to Matus UHLAR - fantomas from comment #12) > We notice the same problem after few minutes running squid 4.6 (debian 10, > x86_64): > > 2019/10/02 05:00:53 kid1| assertion failed: stmem.cc:98: "lowestOffs

Re: [squid-users] (no subject)

2019-10-02 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/2/19 7:49 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > Hello, > > We have recently upgraded debian 9/squid 3.5.23 to debian 10/squid 4.6 > > Since then, we see many errors like these: > > 1569967208.535   3651 192.168.aa.bbb TCP_TUNNEL_ABORTED/200 7200 CONNECT > arc.msn.com:443 - HIER_DIRECT/52.229

[squid-users] (no subject)

2019-10-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Hello, We have recently upgraded debian 9/squid 3.5.23 to debian 10/squid 4.6 Since then, we see many errors like these: 1569967208.535 3651 192.168.aa.bbb TCP_TUNNEL_ABORTED/200 7200 CONNECT arc.msn.com:443 - HIER_DIRECT/52.229.207.60 - 1569967212.488 170668 192.168.cc.ddd TCP_TUNNEL_ABORTE

Re: [squid-users] Squid Benchmark

2019-10-02 Thread reinerotto
>... considering security and filtering ...< Regarding filtering, you might consider DNS-based filtering. I did special developments in this area, i.e. for "Parental Control" and ad/tracker-blocking. "TLS everywhere" I consider a special trick of goggle, to protect their ads/trackers from being ea