Re: [squid-users] Regression after upgrading 3.5.27 -> 4.1

2018-07-25 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 7/25/18 6:46 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: What is your "squid -v" output? If --disable-http-violations is used then relaxed parser will not include those "must never be transmitted in un-escaped form" (RFC 2396) characters. It's there!!! Thanks for pointing me in the correct direction. I'm of

Re: [squid-users] Regression after upgrading 3.5.27 -> 4.1

2018-07-25 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 26/07/18 03:55, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 7/25/18 4:54 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: >> On 07/25/2018 01:12 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>> On 7/22/18 3:29 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>> > http://xxx.xxx.xx/rest?method=navi_path.add&opera=I029&tipo=0&descr=X%20-%20Xxxx

Re: [squid-users] Regression after upgrading 3.5.27 -> 4.1

2018-07-25 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 7/25/18 4:54 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: On 07/25/2018 01:12 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 7/22/18 3:29 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: http://xxx.xxx.xx/rest?method=navi_path.add&opera=I029&tipo=0&descr=X%20-%20Xxx%20xxx%20xxx%2030/12/2014%20-%20&x_xxx

Re: [squid-users] Regression after upgrading 3.5.27 -> 4.1

2018-07-25 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 07/25/2018 01:12 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 7/22/18 3:29 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >>> http://xxx.xxx.xx/rest?method=navi_path.add&opera=I029&tipo=0&descr=X%20-%20Xxx%20xxx%20xxx%2030/12/2014%20-%20&x_=0¶ms={idDoc:%27C0002019%27,clasDoc:

Re: [squid-users] Regression after upgrading 3.5.27 -> 4.1

2018-07-25 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 7/22/18 3:29 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: http://xxx.xxx.xx/rest?method=navi_path.add&opera=I029&tipo=0&descr=X%20-%20Xxx%20xxx%20xxx%2030/12/2014%20-%20&x_=0¶ms={idDoc:%27C0002019%27,clasDoc:%27XX%27,nomeDoc:%27X%20-%20Xxx%20x