[squid-users] Kerberos issues on 4.1

2018-07-16 Thread Victor Sudakov
Dear Colleagues, After upgrading to Squid 4.1 (from FreeBSD ports) I started having problems with Kerberos authentication. A user complained about being denied access. The strange things are that: 1. There was only one such user, others seemed to be authenticating properly (or just did not com

Re: [squid-users] shared_memory_locking failed to mlock

2018-07-16 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 07/16/2018 05:08 PM, Gordon Hsiao wrote: > On a x86/64bit ubuntu machine if I set 'workers 4' and run: > squid --foreground -f /etc/squid.conf 2>&1 |grep mlock >   mlock(0x7f2e5bfb2000, 8)                = 0 >   mlock(0x7f2e5bf9f000, 73912)            = -1 ENOMEM > squid -N -f /etc/squid.conf

Re: [squid-users] shared_memory_locking failed to mlock

2018-07-16 Thread Gordon Hsiao
On a x86/64bit ubuntu machine if I set 'workers 4' and run: squid --foreground -f /etc/squid.conf 2>&1 |grep mlock mlock(0x7f2e5bfb2000, 8)= 0 mlock(0x7f2e5bf9f000, 73912)= -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory) squid -N -f /etc/squid.conf 2>& |grep mlock mlock(0x7f8e

Re: [squid-users] shared_memory_locking failed to mlock

2018-07-16 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 07/15/2018 08:47 PM, Gordon Hsiao wrote: > Just upgraded squid to 4.1, however if I enabled shared_memory_locking I > failed to start squid: > > "FATAL: shared_memory_locking on but failed to > mlock(/squid-tls_session_cache.shm, 2101212): (12) Out of memory" > How do I know how much memory it

Re: [squid-users] Chrome 67.0.3396.99 irratic request behavior that evokes squid 4.0.21 TCP_DENIED_REPLY/403

2018-07-16 Thread MK2018
Yaay :) :) fixed in squid 4.1 stable. Thank you squid team, you rock! I'll not delete this request just in case someone else wonders :) -- Sent from: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-Users-f1019091.html ___ squid-users m

Re: [squid-users] Chrome 67.0.3396.99 irratic request behavior that evokes squid 4.0.21 TCP_DENIED_REPLY/403

2018-07-16 Thread MK2018
I just realized squid stable 4.1 has been released. Will try it first then report back if problem is till there! -- Sent from: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-Users-f1019091.html ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.

[squid-users] Chrome 67.0.3396.99 irratic request behavior that evokes squid 4.0.21 TCP_DENIED_REPLY/403

2018-07-16 Thread MK2018
- Chrome 67.0.3396.99 erratic request behavior that evokes squid 4.0.21 TCP_DENIED_REPLY/403 - Problem exists only with ShutterStock, so far! - Sample URL: https://image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/chalk-rubbed-out-on-blackboard-260nw-523858522.jpg - squid log of this URL GET... For Firefox: 1

Re: [squid-users] shared_memory_locking failed to mlock

2018-07-16 Thread Gordon Hsiao
after increased shared memory(/dev/shm on linux), it does not help, still don't know why mlock fails, or how much memory it needs to mlock to avoid failing. On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:47 PM Gordon Hsiao wrote: > Just upgraded squid to 4.1, however if I enabled shared_memory_locking I > failed to