If you do not define any exception all the web requests are forwarded to squid
proxy. So, the only thing you have to check is that squid can reach the server
192.168.10.10 (routing and/or firewall policy). Also check that squid uses your
local DNS server and resolves the correct IP address.
Il
On Thursday 17 May 2018 at 22:24:40, Aaron Hall wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Does anyone a "proper" way to run squid directly as "root" rather than the
> squid user on linux?
Why do you want to?
There are good reasons not to do this. What is a good reason to want to do
this?
> Basic inte
Greetings everyone.
Does anyone a "proper" way to run squid directly as "root" rather than the
squid user on linux?
Basic internet searches don't appear to give much of an answer.
OS: Centos 7.x
Squid Ver: 3.5.20
Cheers.
--
Aaron Hall
The Paranoids
Network Security
aaron.h...@oath.com
_
Hi people, I have a Squid 3.1.20 for web browsing.
I have a local intranet server called "intranet.com.ar.com" resolving
to 192.168.10.10. This resolution is defined in my local DNS servers
and in /etc/hosts file from Squid.
Is there any way to send the web connections to intranet.company.com
thr
I do not block my Kaspersky AV.
Do you want the Kaspersky software contact the servers of Kaspersky ?
On 17/05/18 09:30, Vacheslav wrote:
Yeah all that I know, The million dollar question is should I continue blocking
it?
-Original Message-
From: squid-users On Behalf Of
Marcus Kool
Hello ,
Only thing I have found concerning the subject is this 4 years old thread :
>From: Amos Jeffries
>Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 14:46:09 +1200
>Message-ID: <5393ce71.5070...@treenet.co.nz>
>To: "ietf-http...@w3.org"
>I have implemented Bearer authentication support in Squid and have found
>a n
On 18/05/18 00:23, Chanaka Lakmal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does Squid supports HTTP/2 protocol? If so, what is the version it supports?
>
No and "sort of". Squid does not yet support it natively. Squid does
support h2 tunneled inside TLS (except when SSL-Bumping) in the same way
HTTPS has always been su
Yeah all that I know, The million dollar question is should I continue blocking
it?
-Original Message-
From: squid-users On Behalf Of
Marcus Kool
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 3:22 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] kaspersky and ufdbguard
195.122.177.16
Hi,
Does Squid supports HTTP/2 protocol? If so, what is the version it supports?
Regards,
Chanaka Lakmal
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
195.122.177.165 is an IP address of Kaspersky (see whois 195.122.177.165).
ufdbguardd blocks this IP address since it is configured to do so which is
indicated by 'https-option', most likely because the config has
option enforce-https-with-hostname on # default is off.
Marcus
On 17/05/18 08
I have this:
acl {
allSystems {
### EDIT THE NEXT LINE FOR LOCAL CONFIGURATION:
pass
alwaysallow
# !always-block
!ms-data-collection
!adult !security
!proxies !malware !warez
!gambling !violence !drugs
On 17/05/18 17:45, Vacheslav wrote:
> Peace,
>
> When I configured Kaspersky to use proxy, I started getting as an example:
>
> BLOCK - 10.96.0.104 config https-option
> 195.122.177.165:443 CONNECT
>
> I have require https hostname. Kaspersky is updating fine.
>
> Anyone
Guys,
Any thoughts ?
Regards,
Sarfaraz
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad, Sarfaraz
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:36 AM
To: 'Marcus Kool' ;
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: [squid-users] TCP FIN,ACK after ServerHelloDone with pcmag.com
I see a message similar to Marcus' i
On 17/05/18 16:15, Justin & Roseanne James wrote:
>
> I'm not doing anything special. Squid is running transparently and I
> have iptables rules setup to forward port 80 and 443 traffic
> appropriately from my firewall to my squid box.
Traffic must be *routed* between machines. The NAT step must
14 matches
Mail list logo
