Re: [squid-users] How to configure multiple icap protocol services?

2018-04-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20/04/18 14:50, 赵 俊 wrote: > Thanks for reading my mail. > My question is whether one squid as icap client can configure multiple > icap protocol services or not .. > If squid can , how to configure ? > It can. Please read the ICAP documentation:

Re: [squid-users] Intercept Squid Proxy with Docker

2018-04-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20/04/18 04:05, fourirakbar wrote: > I'm using Squid version 3.5 > > My goal is to create a transparent proxy using docker container for each > user, so I don't need to configure manual proxy setting in user. Why have a different proxy per-user instead of a shared proxy? The point of proxying

[squid-users] How to configure multiple icap protocol services?

2018-04-19 Thread 赵 俊
Thanks for reading my mail. My question is whether one squid as icap client can configure multiple icap protocol services or not .. If squid can , how to configure ? ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.

Re: [squid-users] Access Denied for manager

2018-04-19 Thread James Moe
On 04/19/2018 12:15 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I see you have a forwarding loop: > > 192.168.69.115 -> Squid -> 192.168.69.246 -> Squid -> DENIED. > > That 192.168.69.115 is trying to fetch "http://proxy1.sma.com";. But the > Squid appears to think its hostname is "sma-server3". > Ah. It wo

[squid-users] Intercept Squid Proxy with Docker

2018-04-19 Thread fourirakbar
I'm using Squid version 3.5 My goal is to create a transparent proxy using docker container for each user, so I don't need to configure manual proxy setting in user. *So this is what I want:* 1. Guest login to the system (done) 2. After login, system noted ID and IP (done) 3. In other mach

Re: [squid-users] Access Denied for manager

2018-04-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
[ please keep replies on-list so others having this problem can also get answers. ] On 19/04/18 05:39, James Moe wrote: > On 04/18/2018 12:08 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > >> For better ideas look as what your access.log states when the manager >> report is attempted. >> > I commented the IPv6 "l