And, if you still insist that you need a proxy, consider Privoxy.
Lightweight primitive HTTP proxy with basic access control, has Windows
implementation, works as service.
It will be good enough.
https://www.privoxy.org/
23.03.2018 05:27, Yuri пишет:
>
> Your task is simple - you need a simple
Your task is simple - you need a simple control of access to the
Internet, for servers, without any caching. Squid here is excessive,
moreover, in your configuration it gives an excessive overhead.
You not requires advanced requests processing, SSL bumping, content
adaptation, AV real-time checkin
23.03.2018 05:08, Keith Hartley пишет:
>
> I don’t need it to cache anything – the goal of it is not performance
> optimization, it is to provide restricted access to the internet. I
> have 1200 Mbps of network i/o available to the squid servers and can
> confirm I am able to reliably achieve at
I don’t need it to cache anything – the goal of it is not performance
optimization, it is to provide restricted access to the internet. I have 1200
Mbps of network i/o available to the squid servers and can confirm I am able to
reliably achieve at least 800 Mbps when I download something directl
And also:
your configuration is not transparent proxy.
a) Squid 3.5 for windows does not built as transparent proxy (i.e. with
NAT support).
b) You do not have keyword*intercept* in your configuration.
This is simple forwarding proxy.
23.03.2018 04:38, Yuri пишет:
>
>
>
> 22.03.2018 23:10, Ke
22.03.2018 23:10, Keith Hartley пишет:
>
> I am using squid 3.5 for windows as a transparent proxy to provide
> internet access to 7 servers in a secure environment that otherwise
> does not have internet access. I have two squids running behind a load
> balancer, each one is running server 2016
I am using squid 3.5 for windows as a transparent proxy to provide internet
access to 7 servers in a secure environment that otherwise does not have
internet access. I have two squids running behind a load balancer, each one is
running server 2016 core with 2 Xeon processors that is either haswe
On 03/22/2018 09:07 AM, claudiu.saiz wrote:
> Yes, I have an ICAP service that supports trailers but negotiation is needed
> in order for the service to enable the feature (as described in the errata:
> http://www.measurement-factory.com/std/icap/#e3).
Sending ICAP Allow:trailers request header is
On 22/03/18 12:24, Edwin Quijada wrote:
> Hi!
> I am a newbie using SQUID and I have a question :
> I have 4 different groups in my company each group has access different
> but I dont know how create an ACL to give access for each group.
>
> These groups and users are in a mysql database in the s
On 22/03/18 11:34, Dan Charlesworth wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone can point to a Squid 4 RPM package for CentOS /
> RHEL 6.
>
IIRC it is not a simple proposition. Squid-4 requires minimum compiler
versions that are not available in those ancient OS. It is often a
simpler propos
Yes, I have an ICAP service that supports trailers but negotiation is needed
in order for the service to enable the feature (as described in the errata:
http://www.measurement-factory.com/std/icap/#e3).
Thank you for the information, I will try Squid-5.
Regards
--
Sent from:
http://squid-web-
On 23/03/18 03:04, claudiu.saiz wrote:
> I want to set a custom "Allow" header in ICAP OPTIONS messages, in order to
> allow Trailer support for ICAP.
That is not how protocols work. Agents advertise what features they
support and recipients can choose to use those features they understand
(or not
I want to set a custom "Allow" header in ICAP OPTIONS messages, in order to
allow Trailer support for ICAP.
I tried:
/acl all_requests src all
adaptation_meta Allow "trailers" all_requests/
, but it doesn't work since "Allow" is a reserved header name.
Is there any way to do this?
--
Sent fr
13 matches
Mail list logo
