Re: [squid-users] tcp_outgoing_address and HTTPS

2018-03-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 21/03/18 08:12, Michael Pro wrote: > Totally agree with you, and at the same time - do not agree. But, > consider the following situation. There is https://site.net/ where > there is 1.jpg and 2.jpg. If I download from this site 1.jpg from the > address 1.1.1.1 and 2.jpg from the address 2.2.2.2

Re: [squid-users] tcp_outgoing_address and HTTPS

2018-03-20 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/20/2018 01:12 PM, Michael Pro wrote: > Totally agree with you, and at the same time - do not agree. AFAICT, I only stated facts, not opinions. There is nothing to agree or disagree with in my response. Alex. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-user

Re: [squid-users] tcp_outgoing_address and HTTPS

2018-03-20 Thread Michael Pro
Totally agree with you, and at the same time - do not agree. But, consider the following situation. There is https://site.net/ where there is 1.jpg and 2.jpg. If I download from this site 1.jpg from the address 1.1.1.1 and 2.jpg from the address 2.2.2.2. Even more. There are situations when you nee

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-20 Thread Yuri
Forgot about: My server is relatively modest (more resources just do not need :)) Just 8 cores (Xeon 2.3 GHz), 16 Gb RAM, SAS HDD's 10k RPM (~300 Gb in RAID-10)  :) Overall CPU usage is ~3% (with SSL Bump). And half of RAM is free :) 20.03.2018 23:14, Yuri пишет: > > 20.03.2018 23:10, Yuri пиш

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-20 Thread Yuri
20.03.2018 23:10, Yuri пишет: > > 20.03.2018 23:03, FredB пишет: >> Hi Yuri, >> >> 200 mbits, more or less 1000/2000 simultaneous users >> >> I increase children value, because the limit is reached very quickly > Because of SSL processing to slow. Investigate, why. Simple increasing > number of

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-20 Thread Yuri
20.03.2018 23:03, FredB пишет: > Hi Yuri, > > 200 mbits, more or less 1000/2000 simultaneous users > > I increase children value, because the limit is reached very quickly Because of SSL processing to slow. Investigate, why. Simple increasing number of children exghausting your RAM. > >> and on

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-20 Thread FredB
Hi Yuri, 200 mbits, more or less 1000/2000 simultaneous users I increase children value, because the limit is reached very quickly > and only 100 MB on disk? 100 MB by process, no ? I think I should reduce this value and rather increase the max of children Maybe such load is just impossible

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-20 Thread Yuri
20.03.2018 21:30, FredB пишет: > Hi all, > > I'm testing SSLBump and Squid eats up all my CPU, maybe I made something > wrong or maybe some updates are required ? Any advice would be greatly > appreciated. > > Debian 8.10 64 bits, Squid 3.5.27 + 64 Go ram + SSD + 15 Cores Xeon(R) CPU > E5-2637

Re: [squid-users] multiple log_file_daemon settings in squid.conf

2018-03-20 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/20/2018 04:38 AM, Rafael Akchurin wrote: > Is there any unique transaction ID in the Squid’s inner workings that I > can see in the ICAP server, by passing it as additional X-* ICAP header? Unfortunately, no. %sn comes close to that but due to implementation bugs and backward compatibility

Re: [squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 21/03/18 04:30, FredB wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm testing SSLBump and Squid eats up all my CPU, maybe I made something > wrong or maybe some updates are required ? Any advice would be greatly > appreciated. Not sure about CPU consumption. AFAIK that is related to traffic loading on the crypto l

Re: [squid-users] [squid-dev] tcp_outgoing_address and HTTPS

2018-03-20 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/20/2018 07:55 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > 2) It is technically possible to make Squid open a CONNECT tunnel > through an HTTP peer proxy to the origin instead of going there > directly. The only thing preventing this is nobody writing the necessary > code. > > It has been on my (and many othe

Re: [squid-users] tcp_outgoing_address and HTTPS

2018-03-20 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/20/2018 05:11 AM, Michael Pro wrote: > Question: how can we break the established channel (unpinn it) along > the old route and establish a new channel along the new route, when we > already know how. Squid supports using multiple sequential connections for the same from-client request, but

[squid-users] SSLBump, system requirements ?

2018-03-20 Thread FredB
Hi all, I'm testing SSLBump and Squid eats up all my CPU, maybe I made something wrong or maybe some updates are required ? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Debian 8.10 64 bits, Squid 3.5.27 + 64 Go ram + SSD + 15 Cores Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v2 @ 3.50GHz FI, I don't see anything about li

Re: [squid-users] Volume quota management availablity

2018-03-20 Thread Yoinier Hernandez Nieves
2018-03-20 10:25 GMT-04:00, Amos Jeffries : > On 19/03/18 23:03, Anoop Sreedharan wrote: >> Dear Team, >> We have an IT environment catering to educational institute wherein we >> have approx more than 1000 users accessing the internet. >> >> having a volume based internet subscription, we are in n

Re: [squid-users] Volume quota management availablity

2018-03-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 19/03/18 23:03, Anoop Sreedharan wrote: > Dear Team, > We have an IT environment catering to educational institute wherein we > have approx more than 1000 users accessing the internet. > > having a volume based internet subscription, we are in need to have a > solution wherein i need to restric

Re: [squid-users] tcp_outgoing_address and HTTPS

2018-03-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 21/03/18 00:11, Michael Pro wrote: > squid-5 master branch, not have personal/private repository changes, > not use cache_peer's ability, (if it's matters - not use transparent > proxying ability). > > We have a set of rules (ACL's with url regex) for content, depending > on which we make a d

Re: [squid-users] Reverse proxy is not responding

2018-03-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 19/03/18 19:13, Kiru Pananthan wrote: > Hi Amos > > I have removed *. dashboard and also timetable which is not in use. > > I have added the accel after port number and removed vhost as per your > advice. Can you check the file now, am I good to go. I have not yet run > the query  "squid -k pa

Re: [squid-users] Reverse proxy is not responding

2018-03-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20/03/18 03:40, Kiru Pananthan wrote: > Hi Amos > > I have run the command of "squid -k parse" and attached output in the > config file link  > Config file URL >  https://goo.gl/Q4a749 > You see anything looking odd in that output? Many of the wrong syntax things I have mentioned should also

Re: [squid-users] multiple log_file_daemon settings in squid.conf

2018-03-20 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20/03/18 23:38, Rafael Akchurin wrote: > Greetings all, > > I am trying to find the best (easiest, least interfering) solution for > the following problem. > > Our custom ICAP server writes various information about ICAP transaction > (user name, policy ip, detection module, timings, words tri

[squid-users] tcp_outgoing_address and HTTPS

2018-03-20 Thread Michael Pro
squid-5 master branch, not have personal/private repository changes, not use cache_peer's ability, (if it's matters - not use transparent proxying ability). We have a set of rules (ACL's with url regex) for content, depending on which we make a decision for the outgoing address, for example, fro

[squid-users] multiple log_file_daemon settings in squid.conf

2018-03-20 Thread Rafael Akchurin
Greetings all, I am trying to find the best (easiest, least interfering) solution for the following problem. Our custom ICAP server writes various information about ICAP transaction (user name, policy ip, detection module, timings, words triggered detection, etc) into the record database. This