Privet !
>Could you please elaborate? What’s wrong with rock on ext4? <
Default ext4 uses a "journal" of the modifications. Which adds I/O.
Timestamps of filemods are other I/Os. I do not think, that these features
are required for rock. Disabling journal completely will cause loss of data
(cached)
Notice, it appears on both http/https ports, not only SSL
De : squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] De la
part de David Touzeau
Envoyé : lundi 22 janvier 2018 23:39
À : squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Objet : [squid-users] v4.0.22 error:transaction-end-before-head
Hi
I'm using Squid Cache: Version 4.0.22 in transparent method
After several times the SSL port going into < freeze mode > and write in
logs
1516660011.849 00 192.168.1.214 NONE/000 0 NONE
error:transaction-end-before-headers -
Doing a squid -k reconfigure release all freeze r
On 01/22/2018 11:01 AM, Gopi Joshi wrote:
> I have installed Squid 3.5 on REdHat and configured it in transparent
> mode using WCCP. On 4500 switch we are redirecting Port 80 and 443 , i
> am not able to see SSL websites in access.logs , it shows only IP
> address.also we are not able to webchain
Hello
I have installed Squid 3.5 on REdHat and configured it in transparent mode
using WCCP. On 4500 switch we are redirecting Port 80 and 443 , i am not
able to see SSL websites in access.logs , it shows only IP address.also we
are not able to webchain SSL websites based on URL , below is configu
On 01/22/2018 02:39 AM, Ivan Larionov wrote:
> What’s wrong with rock on ext4?
ext4 does a lot more than rock needs in most environments. More useless
work usually means more overhead/worse performance. YMMV.
> Which filesystem works better for it?
In most cases, the simpler/dumber the filesyste
On 22/01/18 23:43, Adam Majer wrote:
> On 01/21/2018 08:52 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> __
>>
>> Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2018:2
>> __
>>
>> Adv
On 01/21/2018 08:52 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> __
>
> Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2018:2
> __
>
> Advisory ID: SQUID-2018:2
> Date:
On 22/01/18 22:37, TarotApprentice wrote:
> Given today’s announcement of squid 4.0.23, are there plans for Debian to
> pick it up?
>
> Currently they have 4.0.21 in experimental and 3.5.23 in their other repos.
> Emails to the squid maintainers at Debian go unanswered.
Did you mail Luigi dire
Could you please elaborate? What’s wrong with rock on ext4? Which filesystem
works better for it?
1500 iops is EBS volume limit and it includes all IO operations and it has no
idea about filesystem, it just provides block storage device.
On Jan 21, 2018, at 20:35, reinerotto wrote:
>> 1500 io
Given today’s announcement of squid 4.0.23, are there plans for Debian to pick
it up?
Currently they have 4.0.21 in experimental and 3.5.23 in their other repos.
Emails to the squid maintainers at Debian go unanswered.
___
squid-users mailing list
squi
__
Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2018:1
__
Advisory ID:SQUID-2018:1
Date: Jan 19, 2018
Summary:Denial of Servic
__
Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2018:2
__
Advisory ID:SQUID-2018:2
Date: Jan 19, 2018
Summary:Denial of Servic
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is very pleased to announce the availability
of the Squid-4.0.23 release!
This release is a security vulnerability and bug fix release resolving
several issues found in the prior Squid releases.
The major changes to be aware of:
* SQUID-2018:1 Denial of Service issue
14 matches
Mail list logo
