Dear all,
Greetings.
I want to ask a question.
I am using squid version 3.5.24
Keep starting squid process, I stopped using server about 3 days.
After that, the process is running, but access is not printed on the
access.log.
This problem is cleared by squid process restart,
But I don't know
Amos,
here is an example:
http://au.download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/software/updt/2017/09/windows10.0-kb4023814-x86_f07f9708c76807b1b19545521f17d6e2fefdd627.cab
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: public,max-age=172800
Content-Length: 6150968
Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-cab-c
Thanks for your reply Amos.
I just realised I left out some info in the original email that was
pertinent. :)
>How are you determining that exactly?
> squid logs? DNS logs? firewall counters? packet traces?
Quite simply by trial and error and monitoring the results of taking
the 2 DNS/DCs offli
On 12/10/17 15:04, Geoffrey wrote:
Hello folks,
I am finding that Squid will not use the secondary DNS if the first
one is taken offline. In this case the primary DNS is not able to
respond because I have taken it offline, and therefore the secondary
DNS should be queried by squid, but is not.
Hello folks,
I am finding that Squid will not use the secondary DNS if the first
one is taken offline. In this case the primary DNS is not able to
respond because I have taken it offline, and therefore the secondary
DNS should be queried by squid, but is not.
I have 2 Windows recursive DNS server
12.10.2017 1:28, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
>
>> Squid does not work well with 206. Also requires some additional work
>> external relatively squid to cache WU.
>>
>>
>
> Actually it barely works with 206, there's a bug report open about it
>
We do not talk badly about the dead and the bugs discover
On 12/10/17 04:57, EdouardM wrote:
Hi All,
question i have in mind about the refresh_pattern and multi-access...
let say i use a refresh_pattern about 1 month with an already cached object,
the question is:
- scenario 1: whatever the number of times the object will be requested,
once the delay (1
Squid does not work well with 206. Also requires some additional work
external relatively squid to cache WU.
Actually it barely works with 206, there's a bug report open about it
--
Atenciosamente / Best Regards,
Heiler Bemerguy
Network Manager - CINBESA
55 91 98151-4894/3184-1751
__
The problem to cache WU with squid is:
1507749149.193 6476 172.16.100.103 TCP_HIT/206 1049109 GET
http://download.win
dowsupdate.com/c/msdownload/update/software/uprl/2017/09/windows-kb890830-v5.53-
delta_b0898f8fe7445096d0e1085266012331038a729b.exe - HIER_NONE/-
application/oct
et-stream
Reque
It is possible, with some kind of work. However, better to use more
appropriate tool to cache WU.
This tool named WSUS. With inventory functions. Squid is not most
appropriate tool for this job. At least, you will be forced not only
cache - but keep terabytes of data.
11.10.2017 21:10, davide.mo
Hi All,
question i have in mind about the refresh_pattern and multi-access...
let say i use a refresh_pattern about 1 month with an already cached object,
the question is:
- scenario 1: whatever the number of times the object will be requested,
once the delay (1 month) is expired the Squid will dow
Hi to everybody,
hope that someone can help me with this issue.
I've set up squid as transparent proxy and I would like to cache the
Windows Update in order to gain bandwidth. I follow step by step the
related page on the wiki but every time I try to download the windows
updates from the setting
Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > Alex Rousskov wrote:
> >> On 10/10/2017 07:50 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> >>
> >>> When updating several almost identical FreeBSD hosts via a
> >>> squid-3.5.27 proxy, I expect to see lots of HITs, because the patches
> >>> on the update server should be identical too.
> >>
On 10/11/2017 04:52 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 11/10/17 23:31, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>> Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>> To be sure that you are comparing apples to apples, you would need
>>> to log the X-Cache-Lookup response header to access.log (or enable
>>> ALL,2 debugging to see headers and/or col
On 11/10/17 23:31, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 10/10/2017 07:50 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
When updating several almost identical FreeBSD hosts via a
squid-3.5.27 proxy, I expect to see lots of HITs, because the patches
on the update server should be identical too.
However, I
Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 10/10/2017 07:50 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> > When updating several almost identical FreeBSD hosts via a
> > squid-3.5.27 proxy, I expect to see lots of HITs, because the patches
> > on the update server should be identical too.
> >
> > However, I see lots of TCP_REFR
16 matches
Mail list logo
