On 30/08/17 03:12, Alex Gutiérrez Martínez wrote:
Hello community, I just installed squid 3.3.8 on ubuntu 14.04. The use
of this software is only providing the Internet to my users. But
something is wrong with my setup. I must clarify that I use as an
authentication system the Ldap plug-in that
On 30/08/17 04:02, Olivier MARCHETTA wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for posting fast.
But if I have done another test using Internet Explorer to download the files
instead of WebDAV.
And now I will see the cache Hits raising up to 100% in the memory.
Yay.
-
Hello,
Sorry for posting fast.
But if I have done another test using Internet Explorer to download the files
instead of WebDAV.
And now I will see the cache Hits raising up to 100% in the memory.
---
Cache information for squid:
Hi
Hello again,
I have quickly setup a Squid version 3.5.26 on Windows and with a minimalist
config file:
---
acl allsrc src all
http_access allow allsrc
http_port 3128
cache_dir ufs /cygdrive/c/squidcache 100 16 256
coredump_dir /var/
Good news. My Squid process "failed" earlier than expected.
This is one of the first warning messages I see in the log when it happens:
WARNING! Your cache is running out of filedescriptors
# squidclient mgr:info | grep 'file descri'
Maximum number of file descriptors: 1024
Available number of f
Fair enough. I can understand why Squid would want to do that for
user security purposes.
Sounds like having a single layer/wide cache using the rock cache is
the way to go. Probably would end up fixing a lot of issues I'm
seeing.
--
Aaron Turner
https://synfin.net/ Twitter: @synfinatic
Hello community, I just installed squid 3.3.8 on ubuntu 14.04. The use
of this software is only providing the Internet to my users. But
something is wrong with my setup. I must clarify that I use as an
authentication system the Ldap plug-in that comes with squid.
The problem is that some acl, al
Thanks Amos. I didn't realize that %>ha{} was a valid format.
--
Aaron Turner
https://synfin.net/ Twitter: @synfinatic
My father once told me that respect for the truth comes close to being
the basis for all morality. "Something cannot emerge from nothing,"
he said. This is profound thin
browserleaks.com/ip . I am testing through Mozilla Browser
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> I remembered something so please also try:
> http://ngtech.co.il/ip.php
>
> and compare it to the output of:
> http://myip.net.il/
>
> and please let us know what browsers have y
Hello Amos,
Thank you for your answer.
I have applied the configuration updates you recommended.
My squid config file is more simple now.
But unfortunately, I can see the cache filling itselt, but not being hit.
Here's the internal manager info log:
---
On 08/28/2017 10:27 AM, Aaron Turner wrote:
> So I guess what I'd like to know is how squid handles a multi-layer
> cache config with ssl bumping?
If you are asking how to SSL bump requests in one Squid worker and then
satisfy those bumped requests in another Squid worker (and/or another
Squid in
I remembered something so please also try:
http://ngtech.co.il/ip.php
and compare it to the output of:
http://myip.net.il/
and please let us know what browsers have you tested this with.
Eliezer
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
Can you share the site which shows your real ip address so I can test it
locally?
Also what is the output of:
http://myip.net.il/
Eliezer
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:s
On 28/08/17 21:19, Sekar Duraisamy wrote:
browserleaks.com/ip . I am testing through Mozilla Browser
One of the sites that use non-HTTP mechanisms to figure out their results.
Squid has nothing to do with the data sources they are actually using.
To see what details are being emitted through
Thanks Alex.
So I guess what I'd like to know is how squid handles a multi-layer
cache config with ssl bumping? For obvious performance reasons, I
don't want to bump the same connection twice. Much rather have the
first layer bump the connection and have a memory cache. If that
cache is a miss,
On 08/28/2017 12:06 PM, Aaron Turner wrote:
> Sounds like having a single layer/wide cache using the rock cache is
> the way to go. Probably would end up fixing a lot of issues I'm
> seeing.
Yes, but it will not fix all of them, and it will probably add a few new
ones.
You have to pick your poi
Thanks for this useful site.
This site cannot be used to test squid in any environment but only in a
specific one.
What the links I gave you shows?
http://myip.net.il/
http://ngtech.co.il/ip.php
??
If you want to bullet proof you network and you have full control over it then
you should use the
17 matches
Mail list logo
