[squid-users] Reg: AIX Support

Hi, We are using squid 2.6 in IBM AIX Server. Do you have any latest RPM for IBM AIX? Please advise. With Regards F. Charles Prem ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-user

Re: [squid-users] How long this object should be left in the cache?

On 04/07/17 02:45, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: Hey Amos, From what I remember there is an object for HEAD and GET responses. I am talking only about the HEAD one. Are you saying that there is no HEAD caching at all? Or that it depends on the GET one? I'm not completely sure, but IIRC the HEAD r

Re: [squid-users] open failed to shm_open(/squid-ssl_session_cache.shm)

Hey, What OS are you using? Eliezer Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il -Original Message- From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf Of erdosain9 Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 18:37 To:

Re: [squid-users] open failed to shm_open(/squid-ssl_session_cache.shm)

On 07/03/2017 09:37 AM, erdosain9 wrote: > What's going on here? There are two problems. One probably exposes the other: > FATAL: Too many queued negotiateauthenticator requests > Squid Cache (Version 3.5.20): Terminated abnormally. Your Squid has received more concurrent negotiateauthenticato

[squid-users] open failed to shm_open(/squid-ssl_session_cache.shm)

Hi. What's going on here? Can somebody give me a hand? I dont make any change so... what's going on?? 2017/07/03 12:44:41 kid1| Error negotiating SSL on FD 481: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify fai led (1/-1/0) 2017/07/03 12:45:38 kid1| Closing HTTP po

Re: [squid-users] How long this object should be left in the cache?

Hey Amos, From what I remember there is an object for HEAD and GET responses. I am talking only about the HEAD one. Are you saying that there is no HEAD caching at all? Or that it depends on the GET one? I am not sure if I understood correctly your response. Would you be able to clear my doubts?

Re: [squid-users] How long this object should be left in the cache?

On 03/07/17 20:09, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: I had to tune up couple things and I have a question about a HEAD request I have seen since something doesn't make sense in them. I have the following line in the access log: 1499068883.928163 192.168.168.102 TCP_MISS/200 522 HEAD http://download.win

Re: [squid-users] Has anyone seen v3.5.x.x authenication work in an all windows environment?

W dniu 03.07.2017 o 09:43, Todd Pearson pisze: I have spent the past few days working to get the latest version working in an all windows environment. I am unable to get kerberos authentication to work. I am struggling with getting the keytab file correct. Wondering if there is anyone who h

Re: [squid-users] Has anyone seen v3.5.x.x authenication work in an all windows environment?

Is this of any help? https://docs.diladele.com/administrator_guide_5_1/active_directory/index.html Also specify what version of windows Server and Windows clients you are using. Thank, Eliezer http://ngtech.co.il/lmgtfy/ Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: elie...@ngte

[squid-users] How long this object should be left in the cache?

I had to tune up couple things and I have a question about a HEAD request I have seen since something doesn't make sense in them. I have the following line in the access log: 1499068883.928163 192.168.168.102 TCP_MISS/200 522 HEAD http://download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/software/u

[squid-users] Has anyone seen v3.5.x.x authenication work in an all windows environment?

I have spent the past few days working to get the latest version working in an all windows environment.  I am unable to get kerberos authentication to work.   I am struggling with getting the keytab file correct.  Wondering if there is anyone who has seen it actually work in an all windows envir