Thanks Amos. Looks like we will be using eCAP.
One other possible scenario comes to mind - I am not sure if this is
feasible. When the block is via DNS (not IP, not all video streaming block),
could we:
. create CNAMEs for all vimeo domains involved in delivering video
. s
On 2017-01-08 10:59, Eddie B wrote:
Can we accomplish the above using Squid?
A basic CDN / reverse-proxy setup does most of what you ask. You will
need to then throw in some content adaptation (ICAP or eCAP) to handle
URLs in the response HTML and any scripts.
Not knowing what the "firewa
We have embedded Vimeo videos on a site accessible only to logged in users.
Because of different firewalls, using different types of blocks, the videos
sometimes do not work for the client.
Aside from cases where the firewall blocks any video streaming, we want to
serve video to clients that ha
Hi,
Is it possible using a Citrix Receiver client behind a Squid 3.5.20 transparent
proxy to connect to a Citrix XenApp server on the internet?
If someone already managed to achieve this I would be interested to know how.
For me it simply does not work, the Citrix Receiver client throws the fol
I’m using squid as bridge like injecting some urls
thats it
thanks
> On Jan 7, 2017, at 8:35 PM, Antony Stone
> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 07 January 2017 at 19:23:47, --Ahmad-- wrote:
>
>> hey mate i total understand Tporxy with CISCO /wccp
>>
>> but I’m asking here other way like connecting
On Saturday 07 January 2017 at 19:23:47, --Ahmad-- wrote:
> hey mate i total understand Tporxy with CISCO /wccp
>
> but I’m asking here other way like connecting ip:port and keep squid using
> my original ip as source
So, where do you expect the reply packets from the remote web server to end
hey mate i total understand Tporxy with CISCO /wccp
but I’m asking here other way like connecting ip:port and keep squid using my
original ip as source
cheers
> On Jan 7, 2017, at 8:20 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 07.01.17 19:25, --Ahmad-- wrote:
>> hey folks .
>>
>> I’m just w
On 07.01.17 19:25, --Ahmad-- wrote:
hey folks .
I’m just wondering if possible .
i have a basic squid on ip:port .
i want to connect over it using ip:port from my browser .
also …
when i visit websites …. i want my ip (router ip) not squid ip to be shown to
the websites .
is that possible ?
hey folks .
I’m just wondering if possible .
i have a basic squid on ip:port .
i want to connect over it using ip:port from my browser .
also …
when i visit websites …. i want my ip (router ip) not squid ip to be shown to
the websites .
is that possible ?
i know its weird … but i want squid
Thank you Amos. I agree that adding the anchor is generally harmless and
you've chosen your battles wisely.
Also thank you Garri. I must have missed your response confirming the same.
For current squid versions the wiki page is misleading according to all
credible references I can find. Any applic
On 2017-01-07 17:33, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
I will try to build a binary package for 12.04 and 14.04 of 3.5.23.
Please do that by taking the official source .deb package and just
re-building it (and libecap3 package) for the older systems. No special
changes.
There are several transitions
11 matches
Mail list logo
