Re: [squid-users] Squid 4.0.15 sni exceptions works for whatsapp

2016-10-28 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/28/2016 03:58 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > OK then I will wait for 4.0.16 to see how it will work there. > In 3.5.22 I see that there is still an issue. Yes, but we did provide a v3.5 fix as well, and I encourage you to test it: http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-dev/2016-October/

Re: [squid-users] Squid 4.0.15 sni exceptions works for whatsapp

2016-10-28 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
OK then I will wait for 4.0.16 to see how it will work there. In 3.5.22 I see that there is still an issue. Eliezer Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il -Original Message- From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rouss...@measurement-fa

Re: [squid-users] Default state for the option generate-host-certificates

2016-10-28 Thread Garri Djavadyan
On 2016-10-28 18:39, Yuri Voinov wrote: It seems bug. On 2016-10-28 19:53, Alex Rousskov wrote: Is it a bug, documentation error or I simply missed something? It is a bug IMO. The documented intent sounds worth supporting to me. Thanks. I've opened the report [1]. [1] http://bugs.squid-

Re: [squid-users] Squid 4.0.15 sni exceptions works for whatsapp

2016-10-28 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/28/2016 08:30 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > In 4.0.14 there was a regression in ssl bump. If you are thinking about the server_name bug fixed by trunk r14898, then it was not a v4.0.14 regression but an original bug. Any server_name testing without that fix is nearly useless (unfortunately)

Re: [squid-users] Default state for the option generate-host-certificates

2016-10-28 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/28/2016 06:56 AM, Garri Djavadyan wrote: > The last sentence for generate-host-certificates[=] option > paragraph states: > > This option is enabled by default when ssl-bump is used. I see no [trunk] code to match that statement. > Is it a bug, documentation error or I simply missed so

[squid-users] Squid 4.0.15 sni exceptions works for whatsapp

2016-10-28 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
In 4.0.14 there was a regression in ssl bump. I have tested with the next snippet: acl DiscoverSNIHost at_step SslBump1 acl NoSSLIntercept ssl::server_name_regex -i "/etc/squid/url.nobump" ssl_bump splice NoSSLIntercept ssl_bump peek DiscoverSNIHost ssl_bump bump all ##url.nobump w[0-9]+\.web\.w

Re: [squid-users] Default state for the option generate-host-certificates

2016-10-28 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 It seems bug. Just always specify option explicity. 28.10.2016 18:56, Garri Djavadyan пишет: > Hello list, > > The last sentence for generate-host-certificates[=] option > paragraph states: > > This option is enabled by default when ssl-bump i

[squid-users] Default state for the option generate-host-certificates

2016-10-28 Thread Garri Djavadyan
Hello list, The last sentence for generate-host-certificates[=] option paragraph states:   This option is enabled by default when ssl-bump is used. See the   ssl-bump option above for more information. But a client can't negotiate secure connection and times out when the option is not specified

[squid-users] [squid-announce] Squid Signing key rollover

2016-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
The PGP key I use to sign Squid binaries and associated files is being refreshed. Squid-4.0.16 and later releases will be signed with the key; Email: Amos Jeffries (Squid Signing Key) Fingerprint: B068 84ED B779 C89B 044E 64E3 CD6D BF8E F3B1 7D3E This new Squid-4 key has been signed by the

Re: [squid-users] Can I block facebook videos globally?

2016-10-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 28/10/2016 7:35 p.m., Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > Hi list, > > > Can I block facebook videos globally? > "globally" is relative. If you can define an ACL or set of ACL tests that match the transactions, you can block them. > I wrote below acls > > acl deny_rep_mime_flashvideo rep_mime_typ