On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 21:05 +0500, Garri Djavadyan wrote:
> On 2016-10-24 19:40, Garri Djavadyan wrote:
> >
> > So, the big G sends 304 only to HEAD requests, although it is a
> > violation [1], AIUI:
> >
> > curl --head -H 'If-Modified-Since: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:29:09 GMT'
> > -H
> > 'If-None-Ma
+1 for Amos direction.
I am still trying to understand what is the difference between a router and a
switch since they seems to have the same CPU but missing one or two embedded
instructions.
Eliezer
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.
It took me a while and I hope that I will be able to get the dumps this week.
I started working on an example of ebtables level traffic redirection towards
the squid machine.
The scenario should be a good example for embedded devices which operates
mostly food in the bridge level rather then the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
No, Juniper is not my area ;)
It is impossible to know everything :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYDpOEAAoJENNXIZxhPexGUWEH/jdttWLpJNQm49z0XlTMwwIM
HfPo3gUEufPGtYSNqvx+XWq448BMr+VxvcMi5ojDhE43FhHpLgCaJK40mw8U2M/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Compared with PBR - definitely.
IF OS TCP stack supports bridging - exactly.
25.10.2016 3:59, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
> So what you are illustrating is that if we will handle the connection
> interception using bridge tables it would be much more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ah - in Squid's wiki don't pay attention on Variant III.
This is minimalistic topology, main goal was as minimum hardware units
as possible (for cost minimization).
Also VRF-variant still in progress. We can't solve DNS proxying task as
required
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Well, if we're talking about squid-based appliances.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/CiscoIOSv15Wccp2
In this article descrived approx. half-year experimental experience with
various LAN topologies, and Cisco devices.
Mo
On 23/10/2016 10:35 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 22/10/2016 12:21 a.m., André Janna wrote:
I set up a Squid proxy that forwards all requests to 2 parent caches.
I'm using Squid version 3.5.19.
My goal is that multiple connection from a client to a server should be
forwarded to the same parent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
No.
24.10.2016 23:40, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
> And why would you want this exactly?
> The most simple thing is to use routing policy and to monitor the proxy in
> a much higher level then WCCP.
Based on my personal experience with WCCP (over 6 ye
Just to understand the scenario:
You have let say 1 client on network 192.168.0.0/24
You have a proxy at 192.168.0.200
The client doesn’t have a gateway in the network IE cannot run dns queries
or pings to the internet.
The client must define the proxy in order to access any Internet resources.
Rig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
24.10.2016 22:28, Nicolas Valera пишет:
>
>
> On 10/24/2016 01:21 PM, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>>
>
> 24.10.2016 22:19, Nicolas Valera пишет:
> >>> Hi Yuri, thanks for the answer!
> >>>
> >>> we don't have the squid in transparent mode in this network.
On 10/24/2016 01:21 PM, Yuri Voinov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
24.10.2016 22:19, Nicolas Valera пишет:
Hi Yuri, thanks for the answer!
we don't have the squid in transparent mode in this network.
So, you route all traffic to proxy box?
Yes, clients do not have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
24.10.2016 22:19, Nicolas Valera пишет:
> Hi Yuri, thanks for the answer!
>
> we don't have the squid in transparent mode in this network.
So, you route all traffic to proxy box?
> the squid configuration is very basic. here is the conf:
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
24.10.2016 22:05, Garri Djavadyan пишет:
> On 2016-10-24 19:40, Garri Djavadyan wrote:
>> So, the big G sends 304 only to HEAD requests, although it is a
>> violation [1], AIUI:
>>
>> curl --head -H 'If-Modified-Since: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:29:09 G
Hi Yuri, thanks for the answer!
we don't have the squid in transparent mode in this network.
the squid configuration is very basic. here is the conf:
-
http_port 1280 connection-auth=off
forwarded_for delete
httpd_suppress_v
On 2016-10-24 19:40, Garri Djavadyan wrote:
So, the big G sends 304 only to HEAD requests, although it is a
violation [1], AIUI:
curl --head -H 'If-Modified-Since: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:29:09 GMT' -H
'If-None-Match: "101395"' http://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chro
me-stable_current_amd64.de
By the way...
When i get this error
2016/10/24 12:13:36 kid1| ipcacheParse: No Address records in response to
'client.wns.windows.com'
2016/10/24 12:13:36 kid1| ipcacheParse: No Address records in response to
'client.wns.windows.com'
2016/10/24 12:13:36 kid1| ipcacheParse: No Address records in
Hi.
The squid was working perfect... but, i need to change the router (for some
problems). So im using a Juniper Firewall like router...
So, now i have this error
2016/10/24 12:13:27 kid1| WARNING: All 32/32 ssl_crtd processes are busy.
2016/10/24 12:13:27 kid1| WARNING: 32 pending requests queue
I'm sorry to interrupt - I remember someone saying that you need to
always abide by RFC? Well, as you say it to Google?
24.10.2016 20:40, Garri Djavadyan пишет:
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 01:22 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 25/10/2016 12:32 a.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 23:5
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 01:22 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 25/10/2016 12:32 a.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 23:51 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > >
> > > On 24/10/2016 9:59 p.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nevertheless, the topic surfaced new details rega
On 24/10/2016 9:34 p.m., Михаил wrote:
> Hi!
> Could you write me if you had managed to emulate the problem that I have?
> Best regards, Misha.
I have not been able to replicate it here. I think I remember seeing it
a few years back, but not recently and trying last week my Squid worked
okay.
I w
On 25/10/2016 12:32 a.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 23:51 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 24/10/2016 9:59 p.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
>>> Nevertheless, the topic surfaced new details regarding the Vary and
>>> I
>>> tried conditional requests on same URL (Google Chrome) from
On 24/10/2016 11:49 p.m., Yuri wrote:
>
>
> 24.10.2016 16:42, Alex Crow пишет:
>> On 24/10/16 11:26, Yuri wrote:
>>
>>> No, Amos, I'm not trolling your or another developers.
>>>
>>> I just really do not understand why there is a caching proxy, which
>>> is almost nothing can cache in the modern
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 23:51 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 24/10/2016 9:59 p.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
> > Nevertheless, the topic surfaced new details regarding the Vary and
> > I
> > tried conditional requests on same URL (Google Chrome) from
> > different
> > machines/IPs. Here results:
> >
>But the startup should be 0 in all Squid-3.2+ like you say. Are you
applying any patches to external_acl.cc or helper/ChildConfig.cc ? <
No patches.
Now I rebuilt squid on a 32-bit debian, with default ./configure opts.
Same effect:
2016/10/24 09:54:09 kid1| helperOpenServers: Starting 5/5 'chec
Ha, it seems ASR9000 really does not support WCCP exactly. You right.
WCCP supported on Nexus, on ASR1000... So, your router only can use PBR
or analoquie.
The only idea is to buy 3750 as aggregation switch, config WCCP on it
and connect to your ASR by fiber trunk.
24.10.2016 16:30, Garth v
Dears,
Finally we found the issue as we are running squid on RHEL 7
Service dnsmasq was stopped
We just start it and everything worked fine !
علاء حسن جميل برقاوي
Ala'a Hasan Jamil Barqawi
System Integrator
8191 Takhassusi Road, Olaya
Riyadh 12333 - 3038, KSA
Tel +(9661) 2887513
Mobile +(966)
On 24/10/2016 9:59 p.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>
> Thank you very much for so detailed explanation. I've made conclusions
> from presented information. I deeply regret, that the topic took so
> many time from you. I believe, information presented here will be
> helpful for the communit
24.10.2016 16:42, Alex Crow пишет:
On 24/10/16 11:26, Yuri wrote:
No, Amos, I'm not trolling your or another developers.
I just really do not understand why there is a caching proxy, which
is almost nothing can cache in the modern world. And that in vanilla
version gives a maximum of 10-30
On 24/10/16 11:26, Yuri wrote:
No, Amos, I'm not trolling your or another developers.
I just really do not understand why there is a caching proxy, which is
almost nothing can cache in the modern world. And that in vanilla
version gives a maximum of 10-30% byte hit. From me personally, it
ne
By Cisco employee - “Correct, there is no WCCP and no plans for it either... :(”
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12227051/ios-xr-and-wccp
WCCP supported platforms –
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/133201/wccp-platform-support-overview
Our ASR9001 has no comma
I used the same configuration as this URL
https://panaharjuna.wordpress.com/2009/12/17/speed-your-squid-server-using-google-public-dns/
But unfortunately when it comes to resolve the apple APN gateway it failed and
return 503 service unavailable
Any hope to solve it please?
Access.log
1477295971
No, Amos, I'm not trolling your or another developers.
I just really do not understand why there is a caching proxy, which is
almost nothing can cache in the modern world. And that in vanilla
version gives a maximum of 10-30% byte hit. From me personally, it needs
no justification and no expla
24.10.2016 13:16, Garth van Sittert | BitCo пишет:
Yes, it looks like all of the ASR9000 range which makes use of IOS XR
no longer supports WCCP.
Please, provide prooflink from Cisco.
Policy Based Routing has been replaced by ACL Based Forwarding or ABF.
So? This is therminology differ
On Monday 24 October 2016 at 11:36:34, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2016 at 11:27:17, Alaa Hassan Barqawi wrote:
> > Dears,
> > I am facing issue in connecting with apple APN gateway.push.apple.com :
> > 2195 The name cannot be resolved although I am using google DNS servers
> > and
On Monday 24 October 2016 at 11:27:17, Alaa Hassan Barqawi wrote:
> Dears,
> I am facing issue in connecting with apple APN gateway.push.apple.com :
> 2195 The name cannot be resolved although I am using google DNS servers
> and it throws an error Unable to determine IP address from host name
> ga
Dears,
I am facing issue in connecting with apple APN gateway.push.apple.com : 2195
The name cannot be resolved although I am using google DNS servers and it
throws an error
Unable to determine IP address from host name gateway.push.apple.com
The DNS server returned:
No DNS records
Thanks for sup
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 19:03 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 24/10/2016 6:28 a.m., gar...@comnet.uz wrote:
> >
> > On 2016-10-23 18:31, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > >
> > > On 23/10/2016 2:32 a.m., garryd wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Since I started use Squid, it's configuration always RFC
> > > > complia
Hi!Could you write me if you had managed to emulate the problem that I have? Best regards, Misha. 14.10.2016, 18:51, "Михаил" :Hi.Ready. # squidclient -vv mgr:info | head -n 40stub time| WARNING: BCP 177 violation. IPv6 transport forced OFF by build parameters.verbosity level set to 2Request:GET
Yes, it looks like all of the ASR9000 range which makes use of IOS XR no longer
supports WCCP.
Policy Based Routing has been replaced by ACL Based Forwarding or ABF.
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Yuri Voinov
Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2016 9:
40 matches
Mail list logo
