The
> > #dns_nameser 208.67.222.2224.2.2.4
was a typo that was corrected in my working squid.conf,
> #dns_nameservers 208.67.222.222 4.2.2.4
If I understood the documentation on this there is no punctuation needed, and
nicely squid avoids that kind of syntax confusion.
I found out a couple thi
First, thanks for answering.
Second, I have read the entire default conf file, yes, once made the mistake of
reading one for a different squid version than mine, but then got a fresh
copy of the one for my exact version.
I've also read the FAQ, and most all the configuration guide, but if I had n
On 17/07/2016 10:16 p.m., Omid Kosari wrote:
> Lets assume the all of parents replies are hits . Now is there a way ?
>
> iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp -m tcp -d
> 192.168.1.1,192.168.1.2 --sport 8080 -j DSCP --set-dscp 0x60
>
> is this ok ?
>
iptables is not Squid.
Any Squid o
On 18/07/2016 11:49 a.m., B. Henry wrote:
> I want to limit max simultanious connections for any user in group foo, and
> also limit how may different IPs they can have devices logged in from at any
> one time.
>
> I've had squid3 working well with a very simple policy for years just
> allowing
On 18/07/2016 12:21 p.m., B. Henry wrote:
> Here's is what I have in my working squid.conf related to dns.
> Note that the dns children entry is commented out as when I try and use any
> value this breaks things and I can't use the server at all.
>
> positive_dns_ttl 3 hours
>
Best Practice fo
Here's is what I have in my working squid.conf related to dns.
Note that the dns children entry is commented out as when I try and use any
value this breaks things and I can't use the server at all.
positive_dns_ttl 3 hours
negative_dns_ttl 30 seconds
#minimum_expiry_time 30 seconds
#dns_chil
I want to limit max simultanious connections for any user in group foo, and
also limit how may different IPs they can have devices logged in from at any
one time.
I've had squid3 working well with a very simple policy for years just allowing
access from two different ip ranges, but now want to
Hey Omid,
Indeed my preference is that if you can ask ask and I will try to give you
couple more details on the service and the subject.
Windows updates are considered very static since they have Last-Modified and
Date headers.
Else then that, they support to validate and invalidate requests bas
Apart from previous email , maybe this is a bug or not but the fetcher does
not release open files/sockets .
Its number of open files just grows . currently i have added 'ulimit 65535'
at the line 4 of fetch-task.sh to see what happens . before it was killed.
--
View this message in context:
h
I read your email but now I am a bit busy.
Later today or tomorrow I will respond.
All The Bests,
Eliezer
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cac
Lets assume the all of parents replies are hits . Now is there a way ?
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp -m tcp -d
192.168.1.1,192.168.1.2 --sport 8080 -j DSCP --set-dscp 0x60
is this ok ?
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-pe
On 8/05/2012 6:56 p.m., x-man wrote:
> I also found this posting from mail list:
>
> http://www1.ro.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201004/0015.html
> http://www1.ro.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201004/0015.html
>
> It looks like the guy there is having the same request as I hav
It looks like the guy there is having the same request as I have.
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-peer-communication-about-HIT-MISS-between-squid-and-and-non-squid-peer-td4600931.html
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/
Do you found any solution ? I have same problem and looking for solution .
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-peer-communication-about-HIT-MISS-between-squid-and-and-non-squid-peer-tp4600931p4678531.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing
Dear Eliezer,
Thanks for reply .
1. I am trying to understand but with your description it would be simpler
2. I already use logical volumes . Silly question
3. I don't want just a hit in log . I try to describe my need . Currently we
have exclude the cache hits (based on TOS value) from our c
15 matches
Mail list logo
