Many thanks Markus, i solved everythings!
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 1:25 AM
From: "Markus Moeller"
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] NEGOTIATE Kerberos Auth
Hi,
1) Yes, you should see user@DOMAIN for kerberos authentication, but if you
sorry
it seems that http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com doesnt
remove posts
Yuri Voinov wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I said exactly: "Cache peer cannot use re-crypting right now".
>
> No matter what do you have behind cache_peer.
>
> 30.03.16 2:4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I said exactly: "Cache peer cannot use re-crypting right now".
No matter what do you have behind cache_peer.
30.03.16 2:40, Baselsayeh пишет:
> is there a workaround that i can use cache peer and squid sslbump?
> isnt stunnel is using ssl that sq
sorry
it seems that http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com doesnt
remove posts
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/ssl-stunnel-and-cache-peer-tp4676844p4676852.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
is there a workaround that i can use cache peer and squid sslbump?
isnt stunnel is using ssl that squid dont need to re-crypting?
Yuri Voinov wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> He means something like privoxy.
>
> It possible tunnel https.
>
> The similar config ofte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
There is no workaround.
30.03.16 2:38, Baselsayeh пишет:
> is there a workaround that i can use ssl bump with cache peer?
>
>
> Yuri Voinov wrote
> He means something like privoxy.
>
> It possible tunnel https.
>
> The similar config often uses fo
is there a workaround that i can use ssl bump with cache peer?
Yuri Voinov wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> He means something like privoxy.
>
> It possible tunnel https.
>
> The similar config often uses for tunnel some proxied connections to Tor
> or another ISP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
He means something like privoxy.
It possible tunnel https.
The similar config often uses for tunnel some proxied connections to Tor
or another ISP or something.
But the thing he required is not possible. Cache peers does not support
re-crypting
On Tuesday 29 Mar 2016 at 20:11, Baselsayeh wrote:
> my setup is
> my pc with squid(as stunnel client) -> stunnel and proxy(normal non
> https)
> ive got these errors:
> 2-i cant surf any https site
What do you mean by the remote proxy being "normal non https"?
Is that perhaps the reason yo
And note that i need ssl bumping not splicing
Baselsayeh wrote
> hello
> im trying to get squid + stunnel working
> my setup is
>
> my pc with squid(as stunnel client) -> stunnel and proxy(normal non
> https)
> squid should be bumping the connection
>
> my config:
>
> https_port 3429 inter
hello
im trying to get squid + stunnel working
my setup is
my pc with squid(as stunnel client) -> stunnel and proxy(normal non
https)
squid should be bumping the connection
my config:
https_port 3429 intercept ssl-bump generate-host-certificates=on
dynamic_cert_mem_cache_size=200MB cert=/tmp
Hello Olivier,
I really do not know. This also is of great interest to me.
Hopefully knowledgeable people on the list will be able to explain.
Best regards,
Rafael
From: Olivier CALVANO [mailto:o.calv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 7:32 PM
To: Rafael Akchurin
Cc: squid-users@lists.
hi
thanks for your answer, i have a entry into generic information.
it must remove? but this will not happen again?
regards
olivier
2016-03-29 18:33 GMT+02:00 Rafael Akchurin :
> Hello Olivier,
>
>
>
> See if you have credentials cached in the credentials manager in windows.
>
>
>
> Best regard
Hello Olivier,
See if you have credentials cached in the credentials manager in windows.
Best regards,
Rafael
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Olivier CALVANO
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 6:23 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: [s
Hi
we use on a new server Squid 3.3.8 on CentOS 7 with a Active Directory
Authentification (tested in negotiate_wrapper but same
problems with ntlm_auth) .
That's work's very good a time but without reason, a limited user can't
access to internet and i don't know why.
In the logs, we have:
1459
>
> auth_param basic program /usr/sbin/squid_ldap_auth -b T=MYDOMAIN -f
> "uid=%s"
> -s sub -h 192.168.1.1 acl password
> auth_param basic children 10
> auth_param basic realm Internetzugang im VERWALTUNGSNETZ FAL-BK:
> Bitte mit
> den Daten aus diesem Netzwerk anmelden!
> acl password proxy_auth
Hello Fred,
thank you for your help!
Ok, I tried to insert a the acl in auth_param block as you described:
acl pdfdoc dstdomain webgate.ec.europa.eu
http_access allow password !pdfdoc
http_access allow pdfdoc
but no success was shown using the pdf-doc.
Then: Testing access to webgate.ec.europa.e
I'll give that regex a try, funny though, that's just built on the code
from lightparser.pl, must be a problem with the stock code as well, the
original 4 entries that were shipped with it are exactly like the one I
posted.
Thanks,
- Marc
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Marc A. Mapplebeck, MCP/MCDST/MC
18 matches
Mail list logo
