I'm running FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE and Squid 3.5.15 and I'm getting regular
core dumps with the following stack. Note that I have disabled caching.
Any suggestions? I've logged a bug (4467):
#0 0x000801b8c96c in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1 0x000801c55fcb in abort () from /lib/libc
Hello Dear Amos:
I guess i know real reason via analying request and rep header of firebug .
i found our cache obtained data from other cache(not us ) , and Age is
small value or 0 ,
So our cache have to refresh or confirm with other cache often .
and we i found waiting time is very high via m
Rafael Akchurin wrote:
>
> In order to scan the contents of the files being downloaded you
> might need to have eCAP or ICAP module/server attached to your
> Squid. Please take a look at Web Safety - our ICAP based web filter
> server for Squid proxy
It's for pfSense, isn't it? Would it work on
Hi Rafael,
I set the environment variable ROOTDRIVE = C:\ and ran your installer and it
comes up as F:\Squid?
Any ideas?
Thank You,
Patrick
--
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:32:46 +
From: Rafael Akchurin
To: "vze2k...@verizon.net" ,
"squid-users@
On 15/03/2016 2:07 a.m., joe wrote:
> i get lots of those
>
> 2016/03/14 15:19:49.544 kid1| WARNING: HTTP: Invalid Response: No object
> data received for
Nod. What do you think "No object data received" means?
Amos
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-
On 15/03/2016 5:32 a.m., Ben Roberts wrote:
> I have a client whose Squid proxy is blocking PATCH requests (returning 400
> bad request) and defeating functionality in web software that uses this
> HTTP method.
>
> The "Server" header is "squid/2.7.STABLE6"
>
> I assume that an update to Squid wo
On 15/03/2016 3:04 a.m., HackXBack wrote:
> if you stop and start squid yes bandwidth stop consuming,
> but any time you redirect users again the same problem come over, squid take
> bandwidth more than it give , and the opposite must be ...
> in the same time a lot of TCP_HIT in access.log . so ?
On 15/03/2016 2:22 a.m., Silamael wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2016 02:16 PM, Kinkie wrote:
>> Hi,
>> .. has it ever? internal:// doesn't seem like a recognized protocol to me.
> It worked till the update to Squid 3.5.
>
It should not have. That was a bug.
The correct syntax for 'internal:' URI looks
do you have refresh_all_ims onin tour squid.conf ??
put it off
and try reload_into_ims off as well
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Sudden-but-sustained-high-bandwidth-usage-tp4676366p4676664.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list
Hello Victor,
In order to scan the contents of the files being downloaded you might need to
have eCAP or ICAP module/server attached to your Squid.
Best regards,
Rafael Akchurin
Diladele B.V.
--
Please take a look at Web Safety - our ICAP based web filter server for Squid
proxy
-Original
Thanks,
I'm with you no this but it's not clear to many sys\cache admins that
caching windows updates is the "tiny" bit of the wide Internet.
Eliezer
On 14/03/2016 17:37, Heiler Bemerguy wrote:
My colleagues here asked me the same question but I prefer to really FIX
the caching of bigfiles/
I have a client whose Squid proxy is blocking PATCH requests (returning 400
bad request) and defeating functionality in web software that uses this
HTTP method.
The "Server" header is "squid/2.7.STABLE6"
I assume that an update to Squid would resolve this issue but need to
confirm before pushing
My colleagues here asked me the same question but I prefer to really FIX
the caching of bigfiles/rockstoredfiles/rangeDLs instead of doing
something specific for windows updates.
To be honest, windows updates are just a simple example of ranged
downloads of big files making squid/rockstore g
Hey,
I have a question, in your scenario, if you would be able to statically
cache all these updates using nginx, or another cache_peer, would it
sound OK? or good enough?
Eliezer
On 14/03/2016 16:32, Heiler Bemerguy wrote:
Hi Eliezer and Joe!!!
Thank you very much for your support.
I ha
if you stop and start squid yes bandwidth stop consuming,
but any time you redirect users again the same problem come over, squid take
bandwidth more than it give , and the opposite must be ...
in the same time a lot of TCP_HIT in access.log . so ?
--
View this message in context:
http://squid
Hi Eliezer and Joe!!!
Thank you very much for your support.
I have done a test here too. I've replaced 3.5.15 with 3.5.14 and the
high bandwidth (associated with SWAPFAIL) is GONE.
I've checked twice the sources diffs between 14 and 15 and can't tell
what break this.. but I'm running 3.5.14
See my post of :
di 8-3-2016 9:05
Worked for me, stop and start squid, stops the car also. ;-)
Greetz,
Louis
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] Namens
> HackXBack
> Verzonden: maandag 14 maart 2016 14:59
> Aan: squid-u
this problem is strange , squid keep taking bandwidth for hours even if you
stop the users to take from it,
access.log show timedout.
this is problem and not a joke
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-eat-bandwidth-tp4676641p4676653.html
Se
oh really ? so remove the break from your car !!
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-eat-bandwidth-tp4676641p4676652.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
squid-u
Hey There,
I am not sure what is causing it and there might be some network related
issue but I am not sure what the issue is.
Can you please share the related access.log output for these requests?
Are you testing internally or against the Internet?
Eliezer
On 14/03/2016 15:57, johnzeng wrote
Hello Dear Sir :
i hope to optimize cache effect recently , after i checked via firebug (
firefox addon) ,
i found waiting time is very high via monitor hit small object
Maybe there are some error about refresh_pattern ( reload-into-ims) ?
how i do reduce the waiting time for hit object ??
fo
i get lots of those
2016/03/14 15:19:49.544 kid1| WARNING: HTTP: Invalid Response: No object
data received for
http://rpt.cedexis.com/f1/_CgJqMRASGBUiBQgBEJ1OKNTyitoFMIT1mrcFOK71mrcFQMr61aUMShMIAxAUGMF2INSAgMAEKMeBgKAEUNmtxgJaEAgEEHgY7tcDIAAo_4mAoARgAGoTYnV0dG9uMi5pYWQuaHYucHJvZA/0/0/489/1/0/6/0/0
On 03/14/2016 02:16 PM, Kinkie wrote:
> Hi,
> .. has it ever? internal:// doesn't seem like a recognized protocol to me.
It worked till the update to Squid 3.5.
-- Matthias
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.sq
Hi,
.. has it ever? internal:// doesn't seem like a recognized protocol to me.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Silamael wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm updating from 3.4. to 3.5 and noticed that the following
> redirect-URL from squidGuard no longer works:
> internal://squid-internal-static/error-
How big this problem?
It continue get terabytes?
As far as I know, even a moving car can not be stopped immediately.
14.03.16 17:03, HackXBack пишет:
no range_offset_limit , i remove all of them
also quick_abort min and max i put to 0 KB
squid keep eating bandwidth and in access.log show TCP_H
Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >
> > New Internet access rules are being introduced in our company, among
> > them there is a requirement to have special groups of Internet users
> > who are permitted to:
> >
> > 1. Download files from the Internet.
>
> > 2. Use Web forums.
> >
> > 3. Use streaming au
when it finish eating the bandwidth then no thing show on access.log
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-eat-bandwidth-tp4676641p4676644.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
no range_offset_limit , i remove all of them
also quick_abort min and max i put to 0 KB
squid keep eating bandwidth and in access.log show TCP_HIT_TIMEDOUT and
TCP_MISS_TIMEDOUT
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-eat-bandwidth-tp4676641p467
Show your
range_offset_limit
and quick_abort settings in squid.conf.
14.03.16 16:52, HackXBack пишет:
hello,
always in traffic more than out traffic,
also when i stop redirection traffic to squid
squid keep eating bandwidth for few minutes,
so what may be the problem is ?
--
View this messa
hello,
always in traffic more than out traffic,
also when i stop redirection traffic to squid
squid keep eating bandwidth for few minutes,
so what may be the problem is ?
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-eat-bandwidth-tp4676641.html
Sent
Hi there,
I'm updating from 3.4. to 3.5 and noticed that the following
redirect-URL from squidGuard no longer works:
internal://squid-internal-static/error-access-denied
As far as I can see, Squid no parses the rewrite answers through a
standard URL parser which results in the port being 0.
But ev
31 matches
Mail list logo
